Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to TestingBot?
Ad
Ad
Endtest
All
13
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Codeless automated testing
Endtest allows you to create automated tests for web applications, directly on their cloud infrastructure. No coding skills are required. You can also choose the action "Execute Javascript" for a more flexible test run.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't support a wide array of browsers and/or operating systems
Because it's still in its infancy, it doesn't yet have a huge variety of browsers and operating systems.
See More
Top
Pro
Running your automated tests on their cloud infrastructure
You can easily run your automated tests on their platform, just by clicking the run button.
See More
Top
Con
Free plan has limited time storage for test suites
If you are using the free plan, keep in mind that the test suites created there are scheduled to be deleted after around 2 weeks. Endtest will send you a notification email the day before mentioning "Test suites from users who are not on the PRO Plan get automatically deleted after some time," and offering for you to upgrade to PRO.
See More
Top
Pro
Designed for Continuous Integration
It has an API which allows testers to run it on Jenkins or Team City. Other than that, it has a built-in test scheduler to allow testers to preset test executions.
See More
Top
Con
Codeless and locks you in rendering your efforts useless if you want to switch
See More
Top
Pro
Now supports mobile testing
Endtest has added a new feature which now supports mobile testing for both Android and iOS (.apk and .ipa).
See More
Top
Con
Bad UI
See More
Top
Pro
Option to export your automated tests in different formats, including .EXE
You can export your automated tests in a variety of different formats, and run them on your own infrastructure. The formats are either in Python file format or executable file format (.EXE).
See More
Top
Pro
Now supports a wider variety of browsers, operating system and devices
As of March 2018, Endtest can now support multiple platforms (Windows, MAC, Android and iOS), Operating Systems, and more than a handful of devices for both Android and iOS.
See More
Top
Pro
Super fast and affordable.
See More
Top
Pro
Premium version is relatively cheaper than most in the market
Their pricing plan ($79/month or $650/year) includes team plan upgrade, which means the whole team, regardless of the number of users, will only need to subscribe to the $79/month or $650/year plan. This includes unlimited test runs, test exports, recordings, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
It's mostly free to use
The free plan covers a lot, you can have up to 3 test suites, and you can run your automated tests as many times as you want. The pro plan includes some very advanced options that you might need only if you're working with a team (for example, the collaboration feature, schedule test run, API for Jenkins, etc.).
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
41
13
BrowserStack
All
18
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
8
Top
Pro
Good selection of developer tools
IE, FF, Safari, Chrome and Opera come with additional web development browser extensions installed, such as Firebug or YSlow.
See More
Top
Con
Sessions are rejected instead of queued up when all VMs are in use
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use UI
See More
Top
Con
Security incident in 2014
See More
Top
Pro
Huge variety of OSs, browsers and devices
There are over 200 desktop/mobile/tablet browser-platform combinations possible.
See More
Top
Con
Real Apple devices are unreliable as of August 2015
Real Apple devices are a new feature that BrowserStack has introduced. At the moment (August 2015) there are unreliable. Excerpt from an email reply from BrowserStack support: we provide real iOS devices (Beta) and iOS simulators for Selenium browser testing on Automate. Since these devices are in beta, you might encounter a few problems while running tests on them. To avoid this issue, we would suggest you try running your tests on iOS simulators.
See More
Top
Pro
Integration with CI services
See More
Top
Con
No Linux support
See More
Top
Pro
Get screenshots across many devices
Can request screenshots from many devices for comparison.
See More
Top
Con
Uses Android emulators for mobile testing
See More
Top
Pro
I can easily test websites on my local development
See More
Top
Con
May be unreliable
The same test may succeed for some users and fails for others. Apparently there are problems with the test client running on Windows.
See More
Top
Pro
Free JS unit tests for open-source projects
Developers are advised to use the contact form. The JavaScript API is free for open source projects. Unclear whether automated testing with Selenium is also free - apparently not?
See More
Top
Con
No longer free for CodePen projects
See More
Top
Pro
Selenium automation integration
See More
Top
Con
Re-use of VMs across different customers
See More
Top
Pro
Run concurrent tests in parallel
Open source project accounts are limited to at most two concurrent VMs.
See More
Top
Pro
Might be able to test on real iOS devices
It's not very clear if real iOS devices are available for automated testing. On one hand, https://www.browserstack.com/mobile-browser-emulator is all about emulators for both Android and iOS. On the other, https://www.browserstack.com/automate says "Test across real iOS devices and Android mobile emulators" Then again, https://www.browserstack.com/list-of-browsers-and-platforms?product=automate lists "real iOS devices".
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
44
35
CrossBrowserTesting
All
12
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
5
Top
Con
Slow and unstable
See More
Top
Pro
Automate browser *extension* testing
Can automate tests for Chrome and Firefox extensions using Selenium.
See More
Top
Con
Not a sponsor of the Selenium project
See More
Top
Pro
Free manual testing for CodePen projects
Put your code on CodePen and you can manually test it with CBT from the "Choose a View menu".
See More
Top
Con
Typos in the documentation
"relavent", "retreive"
See More
Top
Pro
Uses real browsers, not emulators
CBT uses real, physical devices for live (manual tests). Check the pictures on their blog post. Automated tests use real Android devices (Nexus, Galaxy) and iPad and iPhone simulators.
See More
Top
Con
Can't change physical iOS device orientation
All iOS devices are physical and arranged in portrait mode. Emulators/simulators and Android devices can change their orientation via a button or keyboard combination.
See More
Top
Pro
Community / forum
Only 350 users, likely because the Forum isn't linked prominently in the top nav menu and because it uses a crappy engine.
See More
Top
Con
Very slightly misleading Selenium examples / documentation
The Selenium WebDriver script examples, by default, don't explain what to put in browser_api_name and os_api_name. This leads to an UnknownError: Invalid browser_api_name / os_api_name combination specified error, if you just copy and paste the script. Instead, first select an OS and browser combination, and the script wizard will fill in the '?'s for you.
See More
Top
Pro
Record videos
Record videos of a URL in the browser/OS combination manually or automatically via the API.
See More
Top
Pro
Screenshot comparisons
Automated screenshot comparisons report differences in layout. Manual side-by-side comparison also available.
See More
Top
Pro
Selenium testing
Selenium automation for mobile and desktop browsers, using scripts easily recoded with Selenium Builder.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
17
33
BugBug.io
All
3
Experiences
Pros
3
Top
Pro
Reusable components
You are able to group the steps in tests into reusable components to manage and repair them easier. As a bonus, you can see all test flows on a single project graph.
See More
Top
Pro
Great UI & UX
A design for a high efficiency
See More
Top
Pro
Debuggability
You can run tests and debug directly from a Chrome browser, where you have access to DevTools.
See More
Hide
€0 ; €69 ; €149 ; €299
5
0
Zaptest
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Full blown
Also supports API testing, recording, can be run in parallel and offers integration with MicroFocus ALM, Rally or Jira.
See More
Top
Pro
Free
Free version available.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrations
Integrations with popular tools like: JIRA, HP ALM, VSTS, TFS, and CA Rally.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Android
Hide
Free / paid
2
0
Sauce Labs
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
2
Top
Con
Very slow
Can take several minutes to start a VM, which is much worse than competitors
See More
Top
Pro
Huge variety of OSs, browsers and devices
There are over 300 desktop/mobile/tablet browser-platform combination possible.
See More
Top
Con
Graphical artifacts
Frequent screen tearing and other graphical artifacts make it harder to use.
See More
Top
Pro
Test on Real Devices
Sauce bought Test Object and now offers automated and manual testing on real devices in public and private clouds.
See More
Top
Pro
Selenium automation integration
See More
Top
Pro
Integration with CI services
See More
Top
Pro
VMs are destroyed after each session
No danger of data leaking to other users who might be using the VM, unlike with BrowserStack
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
10
21
Ghostlab
All
8
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Can be used without additional software on any browser
Doesn't need any additional software or browser extensions to be installed on any device. If every device is pointed to the IP address that it provides it will automatically reload that page on every file change.
See More
Top
Con
No Linux version
Ghostlab is available only for Windows and Mac, there is no Linux version. At least for the time being.
See More
Top
Pro
Testing page preset with a lot of useful information
Ghostlab offers a testing page which when opened displays a lot of useful information. Such as, but not limited to: viewport width and height, user agent string, pixel ratio etc...
See More
Top
Con
Not free
Ghostlab is proprietary and not free. It costs $49. Though there is a free 7-days trial.
See More
Top
Pro
Synchronizes scrolls, clicks, reloads and form input across all connected clients
Every time the page is reloaded on a device, it's automatically reloaded on every other device connected. It also registers scrolls, form inputs and clicks across different devices and automatically synchronizes them to each connected device.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-browser and cross-device live reloading
Ghostlab offers developers the opportunity to test their site in multiple browsers and devices at the same time. Once the Ghostlab server is deployed, it offers an IP address running on port 8080 which automatically reloads on every file change.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy setup
Setting up GhostLab is very easy, by simply dragging a URL or a local folder it creates automatically a new site entry and is ready to work. It can then be named or choose the specified file extensions that need to be watched.
See More
Top
Pro
Remote inspection of code on different devices.
Ghostlab utilizes weinre, an open-source remote debugger to remotely inspect the code on different devices. By double clicking the device name that needs to be inspected, and clicking the 'Debug' button, Ghostlab opens a Chrome inspector which can inspect any item in the page of the device and manipulate the CSS and HTML.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$49
12
27
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop