Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to XDM?
Ad
Ad
Console TDM
All
4
Experiences
Pros
1
Cons
3
Top
Con
Unmaintained
Console TDM has never been updated since 2015. You should instead use CDM, tbsm, or any other option because such an unmaintained program could lead to potential security issues. Like CTDM, tbsm can run Wayland sessions.
See More
Top
Pro
Very lightweight
It doesn't require much more than a POSIX shell and dialog/Ncurses.
See More
Top
Con
No customization
Apart from changing the console colors there isn't much you can do.
See More
Top
Con
Very old
The display manager looks ancient and will look ancient due to the lack of customization.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
46
2
Entrance
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Does not need Systemd
So it can be used on other unix-like operating systems besides linux without the need for linux bindings.
See More
Top
Con
Edje is hard to master
EDJE *.edc files are CSS-Like code that is hard to master: https://www.enlightenment.org/_legacy_embed/edcref.html
See More
Top
Pro
A Sandbox
Entrance is probably the most configurable and themeable display manager available.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
15
1
CDM
All
6
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Has almost no dependencies
See More
Top
Con
Bad documentation & install guidance
See More
Top
Pro
Supports virtually any DE/WM
See More
Top
Con
Bad availability in distros
There is no CDM in distros repositories (only in AUR on arch) However you always can compile it from source.
See More
Top
Pro
Very lightweight
Takes up almost no system resources.
See More
Top
Con
Curses-like interface
Very simple and minimalistic graphical interface.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
59
6
LXDM
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Fast and fluent
See More
Top
Con
Requires Xorg-server
Currently LXDM does not support wayland.
See More
Top
Pro
Works with Nvidia
Works well with Nvidia.
See More
Top
Con
Depends on GTK and its dependencies
See More
Top
Pro
Only two dependencies
Only needs GTK and Xorg-Server.
See More
Top
Pro
GTK2 and GTK3 versions
See More
Top
Pro
Works well on USB
A full install of arch on live USB works well on many computers with no text issues with LXDM.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
42
5
Qingy
All
3
Experiences
Pros
1
Cons
2
Top
Con
Ancient fossil dredged up from nearly a decade ago
Qingy doesn't appear to have updated since 2010. That's a long time in Internet years.
See More
Top
Pro
Getty replacement
It is a getty replacement so it will not only replace your X11 login manager but also your getty.
See More
Top
Con
Not a display manager
Qingy is not a display manager - it is a getty replacement.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
10
2
ly
All
9
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Minimal
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't pickup special characters
For example ĂŸ or æ.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple in use
See More
Top
Con
Not very customizable
See More
Top
Pro
Very quick and responsive
See More
Top
Con
CLI-based
Very simple and minimalistic graphical interface.
See More
Top
Pro
CLI Based
It's so much lightweight because CLI Based.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports both X11 and Wayland
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Includes a shell login and Basic Wayland support.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
96
14
LightDM
All
12
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
7
Top
Pro
Beautiful interface
Some greeters such as the Unity Greeter look absolutely beautiful on LightDM.
See More
Top
Con
Not really lightweight
How lightweight it is depends on the used greeter, but they all require much more dependencies than other lightweight greeters like XDM or SLiM.
See More
Top
Pro
Best balance
Best interoperability, best balance between functionality and bloat, simplicity and candy, not distribution or GUI-tied.
See More
Top
Con
nVidia driver and kernel woes
It's been on the decline lately where it's only stable under a very specific mix of kernel and nVidia drivers.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-desktop
LightDM is not tied to any distro or desktop enviornment. You can use it on literally any Linux GUI.
See More
Top
Con
High RAM usage
It uses more RAM than other light (xdm,slim) display managers which results in more overhead.
See More
Top
Pro
Good for DEs without a display manager
If your Linux desktop does not offer a display manager, you should use LightDM.
See More
Top
Con
Poor/missing documentation
See More
Top
Pro
Theme variety
There are a wide variety of themes available for LightDM, from console-like UIs to ones that utilize webkit2 to create flashy and dynamic login interfaces.
See More
Top
Con
Hard to configure
Lighted.conf doesn't even work.
See More
Top
Con
Autologin never worked
After 4 years of using LightDM, I never managed to make it autologin my user in the system and there are always problems with the graphics driver. Crashes too often and requires manual restarting which is dull. Not to mention the developers update it once in a leap-year.
See More
Top
Con
Feature creep
Most people don't need (or even know) all features of LightDM.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
299
42
Slim
All
17
Experiences
Pros
12
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Well organized and thorough documentation
Slim's documentation is well organized and detailed, every concept is thoroughly explained and it is very helpful for both advanced users and beginners.
See More
Top
Con
Very little consistency among different versions
There have been quite some changes that break the compatibility between Slim 2 and Slim 3. Even if you learned how to work with the Slim 2, you will find that Slim 3 requires re-training.
See More
Top
Pro
A good starting point
Slim is minimal and that is a good thing if you want to start from there. It can be easily extended and even supports popular packages that are used in Laravel (like Illuminate\Database (eloquent)) for example.
See More
Top
Con
Dependency injection is too weak
It is not really dependency injection, but just a configurable container.
See More
Top
Pro
REST based
REST fans will love the REST based architecture.
See More
Top
Con
Needs strong bases to create dependencies
The dependency container schema of Slim is one of the biggest PROS and CONS of the framework. It is true that this schema brings so much flexibility to add anything, but another thing that is true is that you need to have strong bases of patterns, and an extensive knowledge of your libraries to convert it into a Slim dependency.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports tie-ins for Rack-like middleware
Rack is an interface used in Ruby frameworks used to group and order modules, which most of the time are Ruby classes, and specify between them. Slim uses a simple concept for it's middleware. By wrapping HTTP requests and responses it unifies the middleware into a single method call.
See More
Top
Con
Too minimal
While it's true that Slim is a microframework, it's still too minimal. When used for throwaway projects or simple prototypes, it's perfect. But in the long run, it becomes less and less useful and you end up in implementing a full custom framework in trying to tackle all the missing features.
See More
Top
Pro
Useful classes
Contains classes for managing requests, responses, cookies, logging, views, HTTP caching, and more.
See More
Top
Pro
Flexible
Slim doesn't demand that you stick to a fixed folder structure. As long as you load Slim the right way you can do anything from there the way you like it.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely lightweight
Paired with swoole it's a micro service powerhouse.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
The Slim Framework is open source and is released under the MIT public license
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely customizable
You can add any dependency, package or class that you want to use as a contained dependency.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports Php 5.3 and PHP 7
See More
Top
Pro
Makes it easy to understand the way some abstract functions and classes are built
In Django most things are abstracted, you just call some function or class without knowing how they were built, but with Slim, you end up understanding the way some abstract functions and classes are built.
See More
Top
Pro
Hooks for executing code at different points in its life-cycle
Slim supports code hooks for executing functions at different points in time during the application's lifecycle.
See More
Specs
License:
GPL 2
Written in:
PHP
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
557
72
SDDM
All
14
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
9
Top
Pro
Supports both X11 and Wayland
See More
Top
Con
It does not support some essential funtionality, like XDMCP
See More
Top
Pro
SDDM can start each DE
Unlike GDM which is stubborn in many ways, SDDM can start both Wayland and X11 sessions and any matter of valid session type, even if it's something obscure like Windowmaker.
See More
Top
Con
Buggy and..
Missing suspend/hibernate/sleep shutdown buttons Needs to much clicks to switch user Missing proper keyboard control
See More
Top
Pro
Recommended for Plasma 5 and LXQT
QML-based display manager. Successor to KDE4's KDM.
See More
Top
Con
Slow
See More
Top
Pro
Security
It doesn't support XDMCP.
See More
Top
Con
Difficult to customize without KDE
SDDM-KCM only works for KDE.
See More
Top
Pro
SDDM can provide full eyecandy
SDDM themes can include animated videos/gifs, background music/sounds, and any combination of the various QML animations.
See More
Top
Con
Does not support expired passwords
You can not force users to change passwords on login.
See More
Top
Con
No Bluetooth support on the Loginscreen
See More
Top
Con
Heavy
It's not very lightweight.
See More
Top
Con
Customizing is hard
Customizing this login manager is hard since you need to know QML very well.
See More
Top
Con
A bit bloated
It requires Qt which is a huge dependency compared to other login managers.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
95
24
GDM
All
9
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
5
Top
Con
Tied to Gnome
You basically have to use Gnome or one of its forks to use it properly.
See More
Top
Pro
It just works
GDM is dull, but it just works, and it is highly stable. It's easy to switch between environments, and it integrates really well with Fedora or other Gnome Distros.
See More
Top
Con
Really hard to customize
You'll have to recompile Gnome's resource files in order just to change the login background.
See More
Top
Pro
Can run Wayland sessions
GDM can start Wayland sessions, which is the default for recent GNOME versions.
See More
Top
Con
Depends on GTK and its dependencies
See More
Top
Pro
Always signs the GNOME keyring
Works with any desktop. SOome display managers such as SDDM don't open the GNOME keyring at login.
See More
Top
Con
Ugly UI
It is very simple, and you can't change the layout.
See More
Top
Pro
Not so difficult to customize
You just have to know which files to edit, and you can do quite a lot.
See More
Top
Con
Bloated
As with anything Gnome, there's a level of inelegance to be expected when it comes to absolute performance. It's supposed to be a login manager, not something bespoke.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
81
26
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop