Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Pleeease?
Ad
Ad
Stylecow
All
5
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Easy to install and use
It's written in node, so you can install it with npm. All available plugins are installed by default and include some development tools like a watcher and a browser live-reload so it don't need more than few seconds to be ready to start to work.
See More
Top
Con
May be merged with PostCSS in the future
Since Stylecow is pretty small and hasn't gained a lot of traction in the past 5 or so years since it was first released but also because it serves kind of the same purpose as PostCSS which is much more popular, there have been discussions on merging the two projects together.
See More
Top
Pro
Advanced API and parser
The parser detects any CSS syntax error found. The output code can be customized to follow your own code style rules (indentation, spaces, string quotes, etc). It has a clean and powerfull API, which make easy to create new plugins.
See More
Top
Con
Small community
Stylecow doesn't have a very large community. This can make it difficult to find answers and increases the risk of the project being abandoned.
See More
Top
Pro
No need to learn a new syntax
Since Stylecow allows developers to write simple, vanilla CSS, there's no need to learn a whole new language.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
6
0
cssnext
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Built on PostCSS
cssnext is a PostCSS plugin, which makes it pretty easy to use for people who are already using PostCSS.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of support in IDEs
Currently there is very little support for syntax highlighting when writing PostCSS plugins.
See More
Top
Pro
JavaScript-based
Because the parser/compiler can function in a web browser, it can be used with systems that cannot run similar technology on the server. For example, you could build a WordPress plugin with a front-end application that transforms CSS.
See More
Top
Pro
No need to learn a new syntax
Since css-next only adds new CSS features in a way that all browsers can support it, it's still CSS. So there's no need to learn any new syntax.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
4
0
PostCSS
All
7
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Fast
PostCSS is 3-30 times faster than Sass (including libsass), Less, and Stylus
See More
Top
Con
Harder to install and keep working
The immense flexibility of PostCSS plus its current rapid evolution makes it harder to install, configure and keep running than the more monolithic and mature preprocessors.
See More
Top
Pro
Flexible
PostCSS allows you to opt-in to the features you need with plugins. This allows you to set it up to behave exactly like Sass, with nesting, mixing, extends, and more. On the other hand, it allows you to use plugins by themselves for things like auto-prefixing, minification, and more. You can even set up your own custom "stack" of plugins to do exactly what you like.
See More
Top
Con
Outdatet, plugins are often based on different postcss versions and don't work together properly
See More
Top
Pro
Doesn't force designers to learn a new syntax
Rather than learn a different syntax, PostCSS allows you to write in pure CSS.
See More
Top
Con
Some plugins need to run in a certain order
Some plugins can only work if initialized after some other plugins. For example, transforming and applying CSS variables needs to run before running a plugin which uses these variables inside conditional transformations.
See More
Top
Pro
JavaScript-based out of the box
Since it's basically CSS extended through JavaScript it works in the browser directly without the need to compile it beforehand.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
43
5
Garden (Clojure)
All
7
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Style webpages with a full programming language
With Garden, you have access to all the core features of a powerful programming language to build your scripts, including functions, variables, namespaces, and data manipulation like map merging or concatenation.
See More
Top
Con
Harder to apply shared styles
Because you are working in Clojure, you can't just paste in raw css style snippets shared elsewhere.
See More
Top
Pro
Full-stack Clojure with ClojureScript for front-end + Clojure for backend
Garden finishes the full Clojure stack experience — you can have the entire codebase in a single language with ClojureScript on the front-end, Clojure on the backend, and Garden for CSS.
See More
Top
Pro
Hot loading
Using the core Garden auto loader or the excellent Garden Gnome plugin, watch your style changes take effect in the browser as soon as you save the code — no reload required.
See More
Top
Pro
Styles as data-nesting are obvious
Clojure is a data-oriented programming language with strong emphasis on simple, clear inline data structures. Garden models styles using these same structures, making the cascade visually obvious.
See More
Top
Pro
Clean syntax
Other options listed include various pain-points like use of @ symbols or too much cruft; because Garden is just Clojure, and Clojure is a very well-designed language aimed to emphasize simplicity and positive developer experience (without semantic whitespace problems), you have the full benefit of a well-designed and general-purpose syntax.
See More
Top
Pro
CSS-engine accessible from front-end
Because Garden is also Clojurescript friendly, this means that you can dynamically effect styles based on app state.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
2
0
Sass
All
13
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Powerful advanced function features
You are able to declare custom functions with Sass (for example, converting units) which can be easily invoked, even when using shorthand properties. This results in cleaner, more reusable code.
See More
Top
Con
Requires Ruby or libSass
To compile Sass, it needs either Ruby or libSass installed locally.
See More
Top
Pro
Nested selectors
Sass allows you to nest selectors which results in code that is both faster to write and cleaner to read. For example, this: .parent color: blue .child color: yellow Will compile to this: .parent { color: blue; } .parent .child { color: yellow; }
See More
Top
Con
Noisy syntax
There is many unnecessary characters when using the SCSS syntax. {}:;@ However using the Sass syntax eliminates them.
See More
Top
Pro
Rapid development
Another big advantage for Sass is the very active community pushing the development forward at a rapid pace. Sass is constantly coming out with bug fixes, and are often the first to come out with improvements. This is an important factor to keep in mind when picking a preprocessor to invest your time into.
See More
Top
Pro
Extends CSS maintaining compatibility with CSS standards specification
It comes with two possible syntaxes: Sass - No parens or semicolons allowed and the nesting is dictated with whitespace. SCSS - SCSS syntax is a superset of CSS – which means SCSS can be written as CSS, but has been expanded to include the features of Sass as well. SCSS is easier to pick up for beginners and Sass has a cleaner syntax. Having both syntaxes means you can pick the one that best suits your coding style. The mandatory syntax rules for both SCSS and Sass results in a more consistent code. For a more detailed analysis between Sass and SCSS go here. To see a nice comparison of the Sass syntax against CSS and SCSS go here.
See More
Top
Pro
Output minified CSS
Sass simplifies minifying CSS files by offering a one-line command that will output a minified version.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn
It's very comfortable and easy to write/learn Sass, even for beginners.
See More
Top
Pro
Compass framework provides added features
Sass can be used with a framework called Compass, which provides additional functions and mixins which can reduce the amount of code you have to write. For example, Compass will take care of vendor prefixes. This: div { background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(#F00, #000); background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(#F00, #000); background-image: -o-linear-gradient(#F00, #000); background-image: linear-gradient(#F00, #000); } Can be written as: .gradient { @include background-image(linear-gradient(#F00, #000)); } For a full list of features, check out the Compass documentation.
See More
Top
Pro
Source maps support
Rather than being limited to editing the outputted CSS file in devtools, with source maps you are able to manipulate the original .scss file.
See More
Top
Pro
Libsass - C/C++ port of Sass
There is also a C/C++ port of the Sass CSS precompiler called Libsass that decouples Sass from Ruby. It is very fast, portable and easy to build and integrate with a variety of platforms and languages.
See More
Top
Pro
New sass package means you no longer need external dependencies
The latest implementation of Sass is written in Dart, and compiles to pure JS with no native code or external dependencies, means you no longer need Ruby or libSass.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use with ruby apps
Since it's written in Ruby, it's easier and faster to use with Ruby apps.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
286
24
Less
All
13
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Easy to learn
Because Less has a lightweight feature set, is syntactically similar to CSS and can be run client side with file conversion on a page reload, it is easy to pick up by anyone familiar with CSS & the very basics of JS. Also, Less has detailed and well-organized documentation, GUI apps that can watch and compile code for you and a huge, active and helpful community.
See More
Top
Con
Less uses '@' to declare variables
The '@' symbol is used with Less to declare variables. However '@' already has meaning in CSS, as it is used to declare @media queries and @keyframes. This can result in some confusion when reading the code.
See More
Top
Pro
Familiar CSS style syntax
The LESS syntax is essentially the same as CSS with extensions for dynamic behavior such as variables, mixins, operations and functions. Variables: @color: #4D926F; #header { color: @color; } h2 { color: @color; } Mixins: .rounded-corners (@radius: 5px) { -webkit-border-radius: @radius; -moz-border-radius: @radius; -ms-border-radius: @radius; -o-border-radius: @radius; border-radius: @radius; } #header { .rounded-corners; } #footer { .rounded-corners(10px); } Nested Rules: #header { h1 { font-size: 26px; font-weight: bold; } p { font-size: 12px; a { text-decoration: none; &:hover { border-width: 1px } } } }
See More
Top
Con
calc() requires interpolation
See More
Top
Pro
Modern features and mixins
Less contains the base feature-set for a CSS preprocessor: Nesting Variables Basic mathematical operations Color functions @import Basic type functions
See More
Top
Con
Limited support of conditionals
Less currently has limited support of conditionals such as ternary operators.
See More
Top
Pro
Popular
Less is one of the most popular preprocessors due to being the easy to learn and its use in Twitter Bootstrap.
See More
Top
Con
No custom functions
Less does not offer custom functions and instead requires the use of mixins. This is limiting in many ways - Functions cannot be called on shorthand values, they cannot return a value, and code needs to be repeated depending on where the mixin is needed.
See More
Top
Pro
Less is written in JavaScript
Many web developers are familiar with JavaScript and because Less is written in JS, it can be processed client side making the set-up easy.
See More
Top
Con
Noisy syntax
Many unnecessary characters such as the following: {}:;@
See More
Top
Pro
GUI apps
Apps such as Crunch, SimpLESS, WinLess, Koala, CodeKit, LiveReload or Prepros will watch and compile less.js for you.
See More
Top
Con
No loop and conditionals block
See More
Top
Pro
Good IDE support
IDEs such as VS Code, Visual Studio and WebStorm (and other JetBrains IDEs) support LESS either natively or through plugins.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
130
15
Stylus
All
19
Experiences
Pros
13
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Clean syntax
Stylus has an extremely terse syntax. Colons, semicons and braces are all optional allowing you to write Stylus code however you want. hover-darken(percent) if @background &:hover background: darken(@background, percent) .test background: blue hover-darken(50%) The hierarchy is required to be whitespace indented which makes it easier to identify which parent selectors child selectors belong to.
See More
Top
Con
Not under active development
Development of stylus has stagnated, there are lots of known bugs and it does not work well newer features like CSS Grid or custom poperties. See https://github.com/stylus/stylus/issues
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful feature set
Not only does Stylus support all the features from Less and Sass, it provides features not found anywhere else: You can get properties from parents and pull them into children and/or mixins - if the property isn't found, it will bubble up until it finds a match Introspective API, where a CSS block can tell if it’s at root level or not and change its output based on this Splats - taking variable amount of arguments in as an array Automatically vendor prefixes @keyframes Pass a CSS literal block wherever you want Convert files to base64
See More
Top
Con
Community is weak, feels more like a pet project
See More
Top
Pro
Transparent mixins
One of Stylus' distinguishing features is transparent mixins: reusuable, possibly dynamic styles that look exactly like native CSS properties. This is particularly useful for using future non-prefixed properties and having them transparently expand to their prefixed counterparts without any special, preprocessor-specific syntax.
See More
Top
Con
Ambiguous syntax
The Stylus syntax is very loose and that leads to ambiguity where some definitions can mean different things. For example, hashed objects cannot be used when you choose to omit colons in your definitions, because the dot notated object getters could also be a nested class selector. As a result, you lose being able to use hashed object getters if you decided to write Stylus without colons.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to integrate in projects already using npm
Stylus runs on node.js which makes it very easy to integrate into your project if you're using npm.
See More
Top
Con
Not as popular as Less and Sass
Stylus is younger than both Less and Sass, and not yet at the same level of popularity. As a result, Stylus currently has a smaller and less active community than the two more popular options.
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful @extend support
@extend gives inheritance and unlike for other preprocessors, you can pass any CSS selector, not just classes.
See More
Top
Con
Inconsistent style/flavour in different projects
Due to having such a loose syntax, the coding style can vary between different Stylus projects, making it hard to apply styles from other projects that use a different syntax style — at least if you care for consistency.
See More
Top
Pro
Awesome error reporting
Stylus has clear and detailed error reporting that includes stack traces and line numbers.
See More
Top
Con
Heavily reliant on whitespaces
Stylus relies heavily on whitespaces to separate and define code blocks. While this makes for a cleaner syntax, it's also easier to make mistakes when indenting stuff, especially when working with someone else's code where you don't use the same style of indentation.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of mixin libraries
Nib is Stylus's answer to Compass, but with the advantage of transparent mixins. Ride css add dozens of useful mixins to Stylus. Compatible with axis, nib and other mixins libraries. Roots is a awesome toolkit that contains a CSS library for Stylus that provides the benefits of Nib and more. It is essentially a collection of mixins that add a variety of enhancements to the Stylus workflow.
See More
Top
Pro
Convert files to base64
Stylus can also convert files to base64 which provides the following advantages: Easier to maintain Gives you the cleanliness of a URL link resource as well the benefits of base64 encoding Reducing the number of requests
See More
Top
Pro
Easier to learn than some of its competitors
See More
Top
Pro
Can do rgba(#hex, alpha)
See More
Top
Pro
Great documentation
See More
Top
Pro
Large set of built-in functions
Functions like max(), min(), sum(), all collour handling functions are all there.
See More
Top
Pro
It has the biggest feature set. Can do more then less or sass
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
161
18
Rework
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
2
Top
Con
Replaced by PostCSS
Rework basically solves the same problem as the more popular PostCSS.
See More
Top
Pro
Extend native properties
Through transforms you can modify existing properties to give them new attributes and options, so instead of managing messy mixins, you can add a simple new attribute where they make the most sense.
See More
Top
Con
Difficult for beginners
Rework has a more involved setup that can make it an intimidating first option for beginners to css processing. As Rework is built around plugins, the documentation can't be found in one spot. The quality of documentation also varies between plugins.
See More
Top
Pro
Unrestricted potential
Because Rework plugins are done in code, there are no limits to what they can do, and they tend to provide more advanced functionality that would be harder to implement in other preprocessors, such as file I/O and custom logic.
See More
Top
Pro
Built around plugins
Rework isn't a language for compiling to CSS but rather a library around parsing it and transforming it. For example, a vendor prefix plugin will inject prefixes around needed properties so you don't have to muddy up your CSS dealing with it. Because Rework is built around plugins at its core, it makes for easier plugin writing if you find you want to add in new functionality.
See More
Top
Pro
Can work with other preprocessors
Although you don't have to, since Rework works on vanilla CSS, you could use another preprocessor that has a syntax you enjoy more before applying Rework's transforms.
See More
Top
Pro
Allows for customized properties
Rework plugins can recognize custom properties and transform them via plugins. This allows you to keep your CSS clean and expand its functionality in a native feeling way, without having to learn a bunch of new language constructs.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
6
2
Sly
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Readable syntax
By using whitespaces and nesting, you don't need braces or semicolons. This helps with keeping the syntax as readable and minimal as possible.
See More
Top
Con
Extremely limited adoption
Sly has just 5 stars on Github and a very small adoption rate. For an open source project this usually means less bugs reported, lesser documentation and few third-party learning resources.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports variables out of the box
Sly has out of the box support for variables.
See More
Top
Con
Not stable
Sly is in the alpha stage.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
2
1
CSS-Crush
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Out of the box vendor prefixing
Rather than require a plugin, CSS-Crush will automatically add vendor prefixes.
See More
Top
Con
Not widely used
CSS-Crush is not a widely used option. The small community of users results in a harder time finding answers to any questions you may have.
See More
Top
Pro
Implemented in PHP
PHP is used in common platforms such as Drupal and Wordpress, which results in CSS-Crush being easy to integrate with most development stacks.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
2
1
CSS-On-Diet
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
2
Top
Con
It's difficult adjusting to different keywords
The keywords are shortened to 3 letters. For example, "background-color" becomes "bac" and "max-width" becomes "maw". These keywords are far less intuitive than their original form and make the CSS much less readable for those who don't know CSS-On-Diet.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast to read and write CSS
Works like Emmet, shorting CSS keywords, but it's not limited only to writing. Also modifying and reading COD(CSS-On-Diet) files is faster.
See More
Top
Con
Extremely limited adoption
CSS-On-Diet has just 7 stars on Github and a very small adoption rate. For an open source project this usually means less bugs reported, lesser documentation and few third-party learning resources.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn and use
Doesn't require programming skill to work with variables, mixins, media breakpoints
See More
Hide
Get it
here
1
4
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop