Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to PySimpleSOAP?
Ad
Ad
zeep
All
10
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Compatible with multiple Python versions
Compatible with Python 2.7, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 and PyPy.
See More
Top
Con
Buggy
In some cases, received XML is not correctly parsed into objects.
See More
Top
Pro
Build on top of lxml and requests
See More
Top
Pro
Supports automatic retry on error
Retries can be configured in Requests transport for a wide variety of errors.
See More
Top
Pro
Caches WSDL files by default
Local cache is configurable and can be disabled (e.g. using all wsdl files from local disk).
See More
Top
Pro
Handles correctly circular dependencies in WSDL files
See More
Top
Pro
Supports WSDL files according to the standard
Identifies errors in WSDL files; uses without errors standard-compliant files.
See More
Top
Pro
Support for WSA and WSSE
See More
Top
Pro
Support for Asyncio
Support for asyncio via aiohttp (Python 3.5+).
See More
Top
Pro
Support for Soap 1.1, Soap 1.2 and HTTP bindings
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
0
50
3
SUDS
All
8
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
6
Top
Con
Outdated
It's been more than 2 years since it was updated. It is outdated to the point that its hosting point (fedorahosted.org) has closed shop, although some forks can still be found on github. Multiple workarounds are needed for modern features (e.g. HTTPS, encryption). Its main fork (jurko) is unmaintained for several years; a newer fork on github (suds-community) ports to Python3, but there are too few commits to fix all the bugs.
See More
Top
Pro
WSDL caching
While it is known that SUDS can have slow performance with large WSDLs, as it must download and parse the entire WSDL on startup, it has the handy feature of caching the WSDL. If you know that the file will not be updated regularly you can cache it for a specified time, otherwise it will default to cache for 1 day. By doing this you save the client from having to download and parse the entire WSDL each time it connects.
See More
Top
Con
Does not support Retry on error
Its default implementation does not support Retry configuration. To use, it requires a custom implementation of the Transport, based on Requests.
See More
Top
Pro
Python 3.x compatibility
Users can achieve Python 3.x compatibility from forked versions of the official SUDS library.
See More
Top
Con
Does not handle circular WSDL references
See More
Top
Con
Requires non-standard WSDL files
Importing local file imports in wsdl require URI format contrary to the standard; URI formats specified by standard generate errors.
See More
Top
Con
No official Python 3.x support
Development on the original project SUDS has stalled and it looks like it will not continue. The forked version gives Python 3.x support, but support and installation may be cumbersome for individuals to undertake.
See More
Top
Con
Lacks SSL support
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
15
3
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop