Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to unittest?
Ad
Ad
Rumprun
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Can run on bare hardware as well as hypervisors
Rumprun is multiplatform and can run on different types of platforms, including hypervisors (such as Xen and KVM) as well as running on bare hardware.
See More
Top
Con
Has some complexity added because it's not based on a language with process isolation
Since C and C++ (with which Rumprun is built) have no language level isolation, Rumprun doesn't have process isolation either. Because of this, sensitive components have to be split into different nodes, isolated by either different virtual machines or different computers.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be integrated to existing systems
Rump provides kernel-quality drivers for a variety of use-cases from filesystem to PCI device drivers. Because of this, they can be integrated into existing systems or can be run as standalone unikernels on hypervisors.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
4
0
pytest
All
10
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Allows for compact test suites
The idioms that pytest first introduced brought a change in the Python community because they made it possible for test suites to be written in a very compact style, or at least far more compact than was ever possible before. Pytest basically introduced the concept that Python tests should be plain Python functions instead of forcing developers to include their tests inside large test classes.
See More
Top
Con
Compatibility issues with other testing frameworks
The fact that pytest uses it's own special routines to write tests means that you are trading convenience for compatibility. In other words, writing tests for pytest means that you are tying yourself to only pytest and the only way to use another testing framework is to rewrite most of the code.
See More
Top
Pro
Minimal boilerplate
Tests written with pytest need very little boilerplate code, which makes them easy to write and understand.
See More
Top
Pro
Extensible (many of plugins are available)
Pytest can easily be extended with several hooks, and the same team develops a number of very useful plugins. For example, you install pytest-xdist, and parallel test execution just works, with all the same benefits you had with pytest (as opposed to having to use a separate test runner, for example)
See More
Top
Pro
Fixtures are simple and easy to use
A fixture is just a function that returns a value and to use a fixture you just have to add an argument to your test function. You can also use a fixture from another fixture in the same manner, so it's easy to make them modular. You can also parametrize fixture and every test that uses it will run with all values of parameters, no test rewrite needed. If your test uses several fixtures, all parameters' combinations will be covered.
See More
Top
Pro
Very pretty and useful failure information
With most other tools you have to use debugger or extra logging to find out where did some value came from in your test. Not with pytest! Pytest rewrites your test so that it can store all intermediate values that can lead to failing assert and provides you with very pretty explanation about what has been asserted and what have failed.
See More
Top
Pro
Tests parametrization
You can parametrize any test and cover all uses of a unit without code duplication.
See More
Top
Pro
Pdb just works
Pytest automagically (and safely) disables output capturing when you're entering pdb, so you don't have to redirect debugger to other console or bear huge amount of unneeded output from other tests.
See More
Top
Pro
Provides special routines to make testing easier
Pytest provides developers with special routines to make test writing easier. This makes writing tests less error-prone and all around simple. It also results in shorter and more readable code.
See More
Top
Pro
Test discovery by file-path
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
0
68
7
OSv
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Quick booting
OSv is able to boot in less than a second.
See More
Top
Con
Can only run one application at a time
Since it tries to have maximum performance, OSv can only afford to run one application per hypervisor at a time.
See More
Top
Pro
Amazing performance
Since OSv is created to run one single application on top of a hypervisor, it offers great performance and speed.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports multiple platforms
OSv can run applications written in multiple programming languages and that run on multiple different platforms. Such as Java, C, Ruby, Node and Scala. With support for other languages on the way.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
2
0
nose
All
5
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
2
Top
Con
May be losing support or cease altogether
According to documentation at https://nose.readthedocs.io/en/latest/, nose may become unsupported. There is a successor project called Nose2 (https://github.com/nose-devs/nose2), but it does not support all the features of its predecessor and recommends considering pytest for those new to testing.
See More
Top
Pro
Supercedes unittest
Nose wraps around unittest, adding some more feature and functionality to it, such as SkipTest or auto-discovery.
See More
Top
Con
Too much reliance on plugins
Having lots of plugins while beneficial, also can be a hindrance. Relying too much on them makes developers feel as if everything's being done by plugins which a lot of times are undocumented or have very little documentation.
See More
Top
Pro
Minimal boilerplate
Nose tries to keep boilerplate code to a minimum. As such, it's very easy to read and write initial tests.
See More
Top
Pro
Numerous plugins available
There's a large number of plugins available for nose which make unit testing easier. Things like coverage reporting, test selection and xUnit-compatible test output can be added through plugins.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
17
3
Mirage OS
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Large collection of libraries available
There are more than 100 libraries compatible with MirageOS available and more are being developed everyday.
See More
Top
Con
May be too much for regular development work
Letting developers work closer to the metal also makes them lose a lot of the useful abstractions a normal OS has which are not built for no reason. Considering this, it may not be a good idea to always use MirageOS for deploying an application.
See More
Top
Pro
Built with security in mind
What MirageOS does in simple terms is to provide only the minimal needed for an app to run. It provides only the required network and hardware drivers needed to execute. Using this approach it minimizes the attack surface for potential hackers since they don't have any shell to log into or any other insecure cruft that other deployment methods, such as full operating systems have.
See More
Top
Pro
OCaml
See More
Hide
Get it
here
4
1
ward
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Async fixtures
Fixtures can await asynchronous code.
See More
Top
Con
Not many plugins available (in 2022)
While ward has a plugin system, there are not many plugins available as of 2022. Alternatives, like pytest, have many more plugins to choose from.
See More
Top
Pro
Explicit fixtures
Test fixtures are referenced explicitly, which helps both humans and IDE's understand which fixture is used.
See More
Top
Pro
Encourages better test names
Tests are named by markdown strings, not the function name of the test.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
1
0
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop