51
User
Recs.
Recs.
56
Updates
Last
Updated
Updated
Activity
13 Options
This option has been marked as Flagged.See in comments
Flexible module bundler that works with ES6, CommonJS, AMD, CSS, LESS and way more through plugins.
Specs
Specs are quantitative aspects of the option such as the price
Pros
Pro Share the same modules client-side and server-side
Because Webpack allows you to use the same require() function as node.js, you can easily share modules between the client-side and server-side.
Pro Require CSS and images like JS
Webpack allows you to require your CSS and images at the top of your JS files. This makes your dependencies clear and reduces HTTP requests by inlining.
Know any positive aspects of this option?
Cons
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Recommendations
Webpack
Recommended 6 years ago
Pro
Hot module replacement drastically increases development productivityPro
Require CSS and images like JSPro
Supports both CommonJS (npm packages) and AMDPro
Supports source maps for easier debuggingPro
Share the same modules client-side and server-sidePro
Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks loaded on demand, to reduce initial loading timePro
Tap into npm's huge module ecosystemPro
ES6 module supportPro
Mix ES6 AMD and CommonJSPro
Version 2.0 has tree-shakingPro
Easy and simple start simple projectsCon
Hard to change configuration in big projectPro
Very fast compared to alternativesComments
Out of Date Pros + Cons
Con Docs are hard to follow
They aren't particularly well organized.