8
User
Recs.
Recs.
24
Updates
Last
Updated
Updated
Activity
31 Options
Specs
Specs are quantitative aspects of the option such as the price
Pros
Know any positive aspects of this option?
Cons
Con New features with bugs instead of fixing old features that do not work.
UVmapping, Mesh, Mesh2, Ui, new Ui, booleans, etc... a lot of features are introduced in each cycle that makes excitement. but actually are so full of bugs that are useless if used properlly. The developers have a fear to fix them. As a workaround, they propose a new "better" version that introduces new issues and more confusion.
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Recommendations
Rhino3D
Recommended 4 years ago
I think there is no better solution for NURBS. But is full of bugs that will never be fixed.
Pro
NURBs tool setPro
Grasshopper procedural 3D nodeCon
Old interface with bugsCon
Tones of bugsCon
New features with bugs instead of fixing old features that do not work.Con
Not good for game developmentCon
UV mapping bad for renderingCon
No animationCon
UI is old and not at the levelCon
Rhino6 not treeCon
Import and export does not work as expectedPro
Best prize compare to other NURBs software in relation to capability.Pro
Good relation beteen NURBs features and prize.Pro
Is very light to render in real time lots of complex NURBs surface.Con
Was not made to handle meshesPro
Surface controlCon
Bad control over polysurface network