Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Join our community
Top Con
•••Top Con
•••
Top Con
•••
Large amount of variations and studies (excessive telemetry) is enumerate: devices, apps installed on device, files stored on device and even free spaces (verbose logging by clusters location). Unconfigurable shields (always revert to factory default). Use of bundled scripts and scripts inline injection, permanent scan of the user device. If you have other browsers installed this will modify or block some features to make you uninstall any other concurrent browser. It creates user commercial profile in local state (precise location,seeds,machine_ID, etc) that will share with any third party affiliates and many, many other anti-privacy or anti-security features... See More
There would be less of a problem with using Web3 solutions if they weren't sometimes looking like an art for art's sake, a jerkcircle shoving down it's own topic down the users' throat. Replacing the Web 2.0 with another commercial solution is bound to end up as a reinvention of the wheel, where even more commercialization and direct monetization will push digital exclusion. Non-profit open source community has achieved great things while so far NFTs and cryptos are, not without a reason, ridiculed. See More
On the desktop: Brave uses the same browser engine as Chrome, meaning it has the same security-holes as Chrome. Chrome is a big target for hackers (being the most popular browser in the world), and a webpage that will hack Chrome may also hack Brave. However, Brave has security features that Chrome doesn't (such as a built-in adblocker). Those features will stop many hacking attempts. See More