Slant community chat on DiscoursePro Low system resource consumption
For users with netbooks, tablets and older computers where not a lot of system resources are available.
Pro Highly Customizable
XFCE offers plenty of settings, and even things like theming XFWM is a simple task (it's just a handful of images.) Many possible permutations of window colors, borders, fonts, etc.
Pro Designed for productivity
It loads and executes applications fast, while conserving system resources.
Con Very slow developement
XFCE tends to be extremely slow in it's development. The last release was Xfce 4.12 on Febuary 28, 2015, a little over a year ago, with the next release still remaining unknown.
Pro Extremely stable
Solid as a rock linux desktop, just works.
Pro Works on single board computers
Run well on single board computers such as Raspberry Pi, O-DROID, etc.
Con Not very likely to have new features
Since it's basically a fork of Gnome 2, and it's created to satisfy Gnome 'purists' it's very unlikely for it to add new features more in line with modern DEs. But It doesn't mean that it doesn't/won't support modern apps.
Pro Extensible
Gnome Extensions offers an easy way to extend the built-in functionality.
Pro Keyboard friendly
It's (mostly) usable without touching a mouse, so you can keep your hands on the keyboard. Shortcuts can be defined in the gnome setting. There are even more shortcuts available when using the gesetting or dconf tool, e.g. switch to desktop 5 to 9.
Con Some areas are unpolished and lack features
Some aspects are still unpolished and lack features - the Gnome design team works well, but seems to not be taking input from the outside world.
Pro Fast, elegant and stable interface
Cinnamon uses a traditional desktop userflow that most computer users are familiar with.
Pro Designed for traditional desktops
Intended for large-screen, non-touch devices that extend traditional concepts with functionality and good looking aesthetic.
Con Crashes
Despite Cinnamon being on its stable second version it still crashes a lot, ranging from plugins all the way to drivers.
Pro Energy saving and extremely fast
LXDE is a simple desktop without a lot of bells and whistles, this allows it to remain lightweight which helps conserve battery power and maintain its speed of use.
Pro Crazy light resource management
Ideal for older hardware,fast execution,conservative look.
Con No compositor
In order to keep the system light weight and CPU/GPU non intensive LXDE forgoes a compositing program, because of this there will be screen tearing. Though a compositor like Compton can be added for those that want it.
Con Development has slowed
LXDE is slowly reaching End of Life, but will still receive new updates as long as GTK +2 is in use. LXQT could be a natural alternative.
Pro Smooth, subtle animations
Nearly everything is animated, but it's not over the top.
Pro Lightweight
Pantheon is light on system resources, giving it the advantage of being able run well on a multitude of setups.
Con Lack of portability
Pantheon is working well in Elementary OS but installing it in most distribution will be a manual process requiring some tuning and fixes.
Con Few configuration options
It is pretty bare-bones.
Pro Highly flexible
There are many customization options and possibilities to tweak the desktop, including widgets.
Pro Has a file manager that provides a good balance between power and simplicity
Included file manager provides several icon, list and detail views to choose from along with features such as tabs, bookmarks, tagging, previews and metadata, network file access, bluetooth file transfers to/from devices and excellent removable storage integration while remaining fast and easy to...
Con Interfaces are inconsistent and ugly
While parts of KDE can be very good looking, a common opinion is that the style is too hobbled together with inconsistent icons and styles clashing with each other.
Con Stability problems
Under certain conditions, most of KDE's components can be highly sensitive to race conditions, which leads to KDE applications frequently crashing, and, on rare occasion, kdeinit itself locking up.
Pro Easy access launcher
That is always accessible on the left side.
Con Files Manager lacks many features
The files manager based on gnome nautilus lacks too many features! With the removal of features such as compact view and split screen, newer versions of Nautilus File Manager are not as useful as they once were.
Pro Lightweight emphasis
With a focus on being "light-weight", it is to KDE Plasma what XFCE is to GNOME: a familiar enough looking lighter alternative to the more fully featured environment that may work better on lower-end devices and for people who want as lean a system as possible.
Pro Modular
By taking advantage of the modular KDE Frameworks, LXQT is able to offer a modular architecture that allows the user to easily swap components.
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Pro Very stable
It runs for weeks on end without noticeably increasing its memory footprint. It continues running smoothly over extended periods of time. Applications that used to crash in gnome-shell (skype-for-linux, wire, firefox) give me absolutely no problems here.
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Pro Get all of the stuff that you need
If all you want is a file manager, a terminal emulator, and a text editor; then all you need is that stuff, a DM and a WM
Con Your computer may get random stuff that you don't use by trying out different things
Although you can uninstall it... e.g. getting three different app launchers, but only using one, or having four different WM .
#16 Gnome
Option marked as FlaggedComments
Welcome to the Slant Community
Stop spending hours researching
Slant is written by a community helping you be informed. Let us know what you’re passionate about to get an awesome personalized feed.