Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
Development
What are the best common lisp implementations?
3
Options
Considered
0
User
Recs.
Jan 28, 2024
Last
Updated
Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL)
vs
Embeddable Common Lisp
vs
CLISP
11
Get it here
2
Get it here
1
Get it here
Pros + Cons
Pro
Heavily developped
Has active contributors, including Google and some quantum computing companies engineers.
Comment
1
0
Pro
Type inference and type checking
Incorrect type declarations are treated as errors. SBCL can deduce types quite well.
Comment
3
0
Pro
Actively maintained
Bug-fixes, performance improvements, refinements. New ports.
Comment
3
0
Pro
Fast native code compiler
SBCL (and CMUCL)'s compiler, Python, produces optimized native code.
Comment
3
0
Pro
Easy install
Portacle makes it easy to install SBCL, Emacs and SLIME.
Comment
1
0
Pro
Free Open Source Software
Parts of SBCL are licensed under a BSD-Style license. The rest are in the public domain.
Comment
2
0
Con
Confusing error messages
[add description]
Comment
0
0
Con
Produces large binaries
[add description]
Comment
0
0
Pro
Compiles to C
Your code can run (almost) anywhere C can. It is easy to interface with existing C programs.
Comment
0
0
Pro
Mature and stable
[add description]
Comment
1
0
Pro
Cross platform byte code
The CLISP bytecode is the same across platforms.
Comment
1
0
One sec!
Are you sure that you want to abandon your hard work?
Delete Work
Continue working
{}
undefined
url next
price drop