5
User
Recs.
Recs.
11
Updates
Last
Updated
Updated
Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
Activity
5 Options
SpecsUpdate
Current stable version3.7
IDE SupportVery good
Pros
Know any positive aspects of this option?
Cons
Con Type inference coverage is incomplete
The default type when declaring and using a variable is any
. For example, the following should break but does not:
function add(a:number) { return a + 1 }
function addAB(a, b) {return add(a) + b}
addAB("this should break but doesn't :(", 100)
In order to avoid this, you have to declare type signatures for every variable or parameter or set the flag --noImplicityAny
when running the compiler.
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Recommendations
TypeScript
Recommended 4 years ago
Saka hasn’t added their experience, pros or cons to their recommendation.
TypeScript
Recommended 5 years ago
LoveableKishar hasn’t added their experience, pros or cons to their recommendation.
TypeScript
Recommended 5 years ago
Leeland hasn’t added their experience, pros or cons to their recommendation.
TypeScript
Recommended 6 years ago
Pro
Strict superset of JavascriptPro
Optional static typingPro
Polyfill for ES6 fat-arrow syntaxPro
Built and Supported by MicrosoftPro
Has a repository of high quality TypeScript type definitions for popular librariesPro
First party Visual Studio supportPro
Adds support for object-oriented programmingTypeScript
Recommended 6 years ago
thermoplastics hasn’t added their experience, pros or cons to their recommendation.
Comments
See Product Page for "TypeScript"Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
Lustre recommends the best products at their lowest prices – right on Amazon.
4.7 star rating
Try it now - it's free