Slant community chat on Discourse| 6 Recommended Products | Recommendations | Price | Last Updated |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 Google Pagespeed Insights Online· · · | 8 | 1 | – | Jul 30, 2017 |
| #2 Webpagetest· · · | 6 | 0 | – | Apr 7, 2017 |
| #3 GTMetrix· · · | 4 | 1 | – | Apr 7, 2017 |
| #4 MaxCDN Tools· · · | 2 | 0 | – | Aug 21, 2014 |
| #5 performance.webmastersguard.com· · · | 1 | 0 | – | Apr 6, 2017 |
| #6 Website Speed Test by Pingdom· · · | 1 | 1 | – | Apr 7, 2017 |
Pro Provides mobile pagespeed score as well
Considering the fact that a large fraction of people nowadays visit websites from mobile devices, it is very important that your site performs well on mobile browsers too. To help you with increasing your site's performance in the mobile arena, Google Page-speed has you covered, it'll test...
Pro Provides a very detailed report of its findings
Once you test your website using Google pagespeed online, it not only gives you a score of how fast your website is, but also what you can do to improve it. These optimization tips can range from minifying assets and optimizing images to leveraging browser caching. Following these you could improv...
Con No option for location of test
Even though Google's Pagespeed Insights does quite an amazing job as a speed profiler, currently it doesn't provide you with the option of analyzing your website from a specific location.
Con Limited actionable data
Provides unhelpful instructions like "eliminate blocking JS", well duh, but what JS is blocking? Without a waterfall/HAR like the other's GPS is seriously lacking in usefulness.
Pro The results of speed tests are incredibly detailed
You can dig deep into your results down to the root to find out what are the issues that are leading to your website being slow. There are a lot of options which you can select to narrow down your results namely timelines, content breakdowns, processing breakdowns and incredibly detailed performan...
Pro Ability to select browsers for testing
If you'd like to go a step ahead of just speed profiling your site and see how not only how it performs but also how it appears on different browsers, Webpagetest would be the best option for you. Due to its vast range of browsers available (From IE7 to Chrome on Android or even Safari on iOS)
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Pro Provides a very detailed analysis report
Like all of its competitors GTMetrix also does provide an extremely detailed report of its findings, which include a really useful waterfall feature and the famous and extremely informative YSlow website speed grading as well.
Pro Compare results with other websites
GTMetrix allows you to compare your site's speed reports with those of upto 4 other websites.
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Pro Comparison
It enables you compare performance for two domains, great for testing different environments or seeing how your site does against a competitor.
Pro Test ping speeds from different locations
You can see by what margins your results vary when your website's ping is tested from 2 different locations, you can then compare your results with those of your competitors.
Con Only for testing pings
Does not provide much of a detailed report, of how your website performed. But again, MaxCDN Tools, as the site's slogan says - is more of a Ping testing and comparison service than a full fledged website speed profiler.
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Pro Provides additional features (Ping, DNS Health, Traceroute)
Sometimes, your website is not the only culprit causing an increase in load times, its in such cases that you might require to use features such as DNS Health or Traceroutes, to diagnose the problem.
Pro Allows you to choose locations from where to conduct tests
This option can be helpful particularly in cases where most of your traffic originates from a specific location
Comments
Welcome to the Slant Community
Stop spending hours researching
Slant is written by a community helping you be informed. Let us know what you’re passionate about to get an awesome personalized feed.