When comparing Fossil SCM vs Postagon, the Slant community recommends Postagon for most people. In the question“What are the best solutions for a personal blog?” Postagon is ranked 27th while Fossil SCM is ranked 28th. The most important reason people chose Postagon is:
You can opt to use the What You See Is What You Get editor or write using Markdown syntax.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro All in one
While most other platforms allow either online blogging, or development offline and hosting on some other platform, fossil allows you to develop locally, host it locally, view it locally, and you can substitue locally with remote if you want to.
It's just one file. Fossil.
Pro Free
It is. It is also free as in libre, as in the license is similar (or equivilant) to BSD-2
Pro Simple to use
Fossil doesn't depend on a specific language to be present on the target or development system. Just write, commit, and done.
Pro WYSIWYG & Markdown editors
You can opt to use the What You See Is What You Get editor or write using Markdown syntax.
Pro Clean interface
Postagon is very minimalist and clean in its design.
Pro Google Analytics support
Postagon has built-in statistics using Google Analytics to help get a better understanding of your visitiors.
Pro RSS support
You can have people subscribe to your blog using RSS.
Cons
Con You have to do everything manually and know what you're doing
It is similar to the "Writing your own solution" option
Con No postagon link
redirected link to https://upstract.com/