Fossil SCM vs Jux
When comparing Fossil SCM vs Jux, the Slant community recommends Jux for most people. In the question“What are the best solutions for a personal blog?” Jux is ranked 23rd while Fossil SCM is ranked 28th. The most important reason people chose Jux is:
Jux allows following people. Follower and following lists are displayed in a visual way - showing 3 most recent entries in an aesthetically pleasing way.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro All in one
While most other platforms allow either online blogging, or development offline and hosting on some other platform, fossil allows you to develop locally, host it locally, view it locally, and you can substitue locally with remote if you want to.
It's just one file. Fossil.
Pro Free
It is. It is also free as in libre, as in the license is similar (or equivilant) to BSD-2
Pro Simple to use
Fossil doesn't depend on a specific language to be present on the target or development system. Just write, commit, and done.
Pro Visual follow feature
Jux allows following people. Follower and following lists are displayed in a visual way - showing 3 most recent entries in an aesthetically pleasing way.
Pro Google Street View integration
Pick an address, a title and a caption and post. Readers of your blog will not only be able to view the exact angle at which you've pointed the view, but also pan around to see the surroundings.
Pro Includes comments out of the box
You can leave response to any post.
Pro Custom domain support
You can set up Jux to use your own domain.
Cons
Con You have to do everything manually and know what you're doing
It is similar to the "Writing your own solution" option