When comparing Pelican vs Nikola, the Slant community recommends Pelican for most people. In the question“What are the best static site generators?” Pelican is ranked 1st while Nikola is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Pelican is:
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Uses a versatile, powerful and easy to use templating engine
Pro Open source
All code is available on GitHub.
Pro Active community
Pro Content can be written in multiple formats
Supports reStructuredText, Markdown, or AsciiDoc formats.
Pro Code syntax highlighting
Uses Pygments for code highlighting.
Easily handles multiple languages, like EN, FR, etc.
Pro Import your existing blog from many sources
Pro Support for unique templates per page
Adds flexibility to create variety of websites.
Pro Customisable Themes and support for Plugins
Makes it flexible to cater to creation of variety of websites in addition to blogs.
Pro Quite fast even for sites with thousands of posts
Can spin up an build sites with thousands of articles in a matter of seconds even on very old computers.
Pro HTML input
Nikola posts may be written in a variety of formats. You can write posts in HTML, with all the expressive power of HTML and CSS, and still have the benefits of a site-wide theme and navigation structure.
Pro Host on any web server
Nikloa sites are static files, and thus may be hosted on any web server that allows you to upload your own files. This lets you use simple and inexpensive hosting providers and still have a reliable site.
Pro Write in reStructuredText and Markdown
You have better choices for markup than raw HTML.