When comparing Pelican vs Nanoc, the Slant community recommends Pelican for most people. In the question“What are the best static site generators?” Pelican is ranked 1st while Nanoc is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Pelican is:
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Uses a versatile, powerful and easy to use templating engine
Pro Open source
All code is available on GitHub.
Pro Active community
Pro Content can be written in multiple formats
Supports reStructuredText, Markdown, or AsciiDoc formats.
Pro Code syntax highlighting
Uses Pygments for code highlighting.
Easily handles multiple languages, like EN, FR, etc.
Pro Import your existing blog from many sources
Pro Support for unique templates per page
Adds flexibility to create variety of websites.
Pro Customisable Themes and support for Plugins
Makes it flexible to cater to creation of variety of websites in addition to blogs.
Pro Quite fast even for sites with thousands of posts
Can spin up an build sites with thousands of articles in a matter of seconds even on very old computers.
Pro Flexibly built
Nanoc is a good choice if you need to support a site with a more complex structure than a simple blog. Nanoc is more agnostic to the types of pages you have, and allows you to do finer tuned refinements like customizing the URL structure.
Nanoc has a modular architecture which makes it easier to incorporate plugins and functionality from other projects as well as extend functionality.
Pro Helps you create multilingual sites
Nanoc takes multilingual sites into consideration and has features to make translations easier to implement.
Pro Unit testing integration
Nanoc has a check command to run tests against your site and make sure it meets requirements you define.
There are built in checks to validate HTML and CSS, as well as validating internal and external links.
Pro Works well with compile to languages
Nanoc is friendly with different CSS and HTML preprocessors, so you can easily use SASS, LESS, HAML, Markdown and more.