Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Webhook vs TYPO3, the Slant community recommends TYPO3 for most people. In the question“What are the best web content management systems?” TYPO3 is ranked 11th while Webhook is ranked 19th. The most important reason people chose TYPO3 is:
You can use both one-tree and multi-tree structure.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro MIT Open Source
A very flexible license to do whatever you want. Code available on GitHub.
Pro Friendly CMS that clients can use
Webhook has a CMS admin page that can be access on the live site. This lets your clients login and edit the site like a traditional CMS system.
Pro Works with Firebase
Rather than store the data in flat files, Webhook stores your data in Firebase, where it can be accessed similar to JSON from other applications.
Pro Flexible Content Creation
Lets you describe your own content types and their own fields easily from the admin interface.
Pro Flexible multi-lingual site management
You can use both one-tree and multi-tree structure.
Pro Multiple websites/domains from one installation
You can use a single TYPO3 installation for multiple websites and domains.
Pro TYPO3 is enterprise
TYPO3 can be used from small to very big installations where it is possible to give rights to users on a very fine grained basis.
Cons
Con Requires registration
Even simple command line tools require registration.
Con Writing or debugging extension in Typoscript is a nightmare
