When comparing Webhook vs Pinegrow, the Slant community recommends Pinegrow for most people. In the question“What are the best web content management systems?” Pinegrow is ranked 18th while Webhook is ranked 19th. The most important reason people chose Pinegrow is:
Bootstrap, Foundation, Materialize, etc. Also many other frameworks, languages, etc.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro MIT Open Source
A very flexible license to do whatever you want. Code available on GitHub.
Pro Friendly CMS that clients can use
Webhook has a CMS admin page that can be access on the live site. This lets your clients login and edit the site like a traditional CMS system.
Pro Works with Firebase
Rather than store the data in flat files, Webhook stores your data in Firebase, where it can be accessed similar to JSON from other applications.
Pro Flexible Content Creation
Lets you describe your own content types and their own fields easily from the admin interface.
Pro Supports top front-end frameworks
Bootstrap, Foundation, Materialize, etc. Also many other frameworks, languages, etc.
Pro Realtime preview
You can see the screen preview at real time. No need to click [Preview] button.
Pro Multi platform desktop software
Windows, Mac & Linux. 32 / 64 bit.
Pro Reasonably priced
Not free as the main con says, but the cost is fair; and it's okay to encourage a company that produces a quality tool at a very reasonable price.
Cons
Con Requires registration
Even simple command line tools require registration.
Con Free update is available only 1 year
Update version will be available only 1 year once you buy the license.