When comparing Appernetic vs Grav CMS, the Slant community recommends Grav CMS for most people. In the question“What is the fastest CMS for web content (news website with some static pages) ?” Grav CMS is ranked 2nd while Appernetic is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Grav CMS is:
Very fast, easy to update, - has admin panel for noobies or just edit markdown files for posts.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro PageDown editor with image upload
Non-developers can easily write and update content using the inline PageDown editor.
Pro Integrated git flow
Git and GitHub is used for version control, cloning, publishing and syncing of your Appernetic Hugo project. No need to manually enter git commands.
Pro Fast set-up
A Hugo site is configured with git, a file structure and a theme in 2 min instead of 30 min.
Pro Integrated Cloudinary image management
You automatically get a cloudinary link when you upload an image.
Pro Developers have complete control over the source code
Pro Fast, easy to use
Very fast, easy to update, - has admin panel for noobies or just edit markdown files for posts.
Pro Does not use any database, a complete flat Elise CMS
Database being a point of vulnerability is completely removed from the equation with it's flat file approach.
Cons
Con Not User Friendly
Require some technical knowledge to use