Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Appernetic vs Netlify CMS, the Slant community recommends Netlify CMS for most people. In the question“What is the fastest CMS for web content (news website with some static pages) ?” Netlify CMS is ranked 6th while Appernetic is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Netlify CMS is:
Experimental support for GitHub's GraphQL API is now available for the GitHub backend. Without mutation.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro PageDown editor with image upload
Non-developers can easily write and update content using the inline PageDown editor.
Pro Integrated git flow
Git and GitHub is used for version control, cloning, publishing and syncing of your Appernetic Hugo project. No need to manually enter git commands.
Pro Fast set-up
A Hugo site is configured with git, a file structure and a theme in 2 min instead of 30 min.
Pro Integrated Cloudinary image management
You automatically get a cloudinary link when you upload an image.
Pro Developers have complete control over the source code
Pro Experimental support for GitHub's GraphQL API
Experimental support for GitHub's GraphQL API is now available for the GitHub backend. Without mutation.
Pro Easy Creating Custom Widgets option
The NetlifyCMS exposes a window.CMS global object that you can use to register custom widgets, previews, and editor plugins. The same object is also the default export if you import Netify CMS as an npm module. The available widget extension methods are listed here.
Pro Modern
Pro Open-source
Pro Built in React.js
Cons
Con A lot of configuration
Example: a few plugins and some code are needed for gatsby-img or markdown to work.
