When comparing Hibernate ORM vs Entity Framework, the Slant community recommends Entity Framework for most people. In the question“What are the best ORMs for C#?” Entity Framework is ranked 3rd while Hibernate ORM is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose Entity Framework is:
List all versions of a schema, apply one or go back to a previous version.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Leader
There are countless great books and articles, it's taught at universities, and easy to find both skilled labour and advanced consultants .
Pro OSS
Fully open source, managed by the tought leaders in the Java community, decision making is open yet sponsored and legally backed by Red Hat.
Pro Advanced extension points
Hibernate ORM sports several advanced extensions such as Hibernate Search providing Lucene and Elasticsearch full-text search, Hibernate Spatial for GIS extensions, Envers for versioning and temporal queries, Hibernate OGM to use NoSQL as your primary datastore, advanced caching integrations and various connection pools.
Pro Actively maintained
Hibernate was very innovative from the beginning but is still very actively developed, improving significantly every release.
Pro High Performance
ORMs are typically not easy to scale yet the Hibernate team has been very sensitive to this topic, constantly optimising the code further and adding various advanced features to avoid paying a high cost for the convenience.
Pro Extensive integration points
Most other successful projects in the Java community integrate with Hibernate, making integration often a solved problem.
Pro Migrations API
List all versions of a schema, apply one or go back to a previous version.
Pro Database support
Supports most popular databases.
Pro Documentation
Better than the chaotic and confusing NHibernate documentation.
Pro Typesafe queries
Linq2Sql allows writing queries using the actual ORM types. This prevents issues when modifying the schema/entities.
Pro Avoids creation of inline SQL queries
No longer do you have to create/close SQL connections every time you want to interact with the database. You also don't have to maintain a database reader to handle the results retrieved from the database; all of this functionality is easily handled through LINQ queries and Entity Framework.
Pro Database agnostic
You can quite easily migrate from using one DB technology to another.
Pro Non intrusive object model
Object model is non-intrusive and consistent.
Cons
Con Complicated
For simple data storage scenarios, EF may be unnecessarily complicated to learn.
Con Performance
Micro-ORMs have better performance.
