Here’s the Deal

D3.js vs Move.js Ok

357 65

3 0

When comparing D3.js vs Move.js Ok, the Slant community recommends D3.js for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript animation frameworks or libraries?” D3.js is ranked 2nd while Move.js Ok is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose D3.js is:

D3.js is a very popular tool with an active community, resulting in plenty of learning resources and fast responses to questions.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best JavaScript animation frameworks or libraries?

Pros

Pro
Large community

D3.js is a very popular tool with an active community, resulting in plenty of learning resources and fast responses to questions.

Pro
Huge number of examples online

Most of the examples provided are by the author, but there's also a great community writing plugins and more examples.

Pro
Doesn't require a proprietary framework

D3's emphasis on web standards gives you the full capabilities of modern browsers without tying yourself to a proprietary framework.

Pro
Versatile library for manipulating data on the DOM

Pro
Very flexible join paradigm

Can be tricky at first, but once learned, data manipulation and binding can easily generate complex visualizations for massive amounts of data.

Pro
Great for highly interactive scenes

D3.js offers incredible levels of interactivity.

Pro
Backwards compatible

D3.js is intended for modern browsers, so supports IE9 and above (IE8 with an additional library) as well as all the other modern browsers.

Pro
Simple to use

Move.js is just a simple JS layer on top of CSS3 animations. It's pretty easy to use because it just exposes an API with which you can use CSS selectors and props to animate objects.

Pro
Lightweight

Move.js is extremely small and lightweight (only 13KB) JavaScript library.

Ad
Cons

Con
Steep learning curve

The complexity and flexibility of D3.js results in it being a time-consuming tool to learn for many users.

D3 is incredibly flexible; probably more so than any other JavaScript visualization library at the time of this posting. With that flexibility comes increased complexity. If you just want to create some quick charts you will get results faster with something else.

Con
"Selections" are elegant, but somewhat hard to grok

Selections are core to working with D3 beyond the basics. They're powerful and useful, but require new developers to get up to speed (e.g. set aside 30m to read and digest: https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/Selections) and if used in the context of a larger application will result in a portion of the code using different patterns than the rest, requiring a translation layer in between.