Chartist.js vs d3fc
When comparing Chartist.js vs d3fc, the Slant community recommends Chartist.js for most people. In the question“What are the best open source JavaScript charting libraries?” Chartist.js is ranked 4th while d3fc is ranked 11th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Uses SVG
Pro Lightweight and fast
Chartist is lightweight at only 10KB, resulting in very little impact on load time.
Pro Offers fully responsive charts
Chartist offers responsive configuration with media queries, which not only resizes the chart but also provides different text and shapes.
Pro No dependencies
Chartist.js has no dependencies, keeping it lightweight and fast to configure.
Pro Built using D3v4
d3fc is built using the latest D3v4, and has the same modular architecture. It is currently made up of 17 sub-projects.
Pro Complements and extends D3
d3fc provides a number of higher-order D3 components that make it easier to build charts. With d3fc you can create series, annotations, samplers and layouts using the familiar D3 data-join pattern.
Cons
Con Very humble feature set
Con Animations only work in modern browsers
Animation support is somewhat limited, with IE not supported at all.