Here’s the Deal

Loom SDK vs AndEngine

12 2

8 5

When comparing Loom SDK vs AndEngine, the Slant community recommends Loom SDK for most people. In the question“What are the best 2D game engines?” Loom SDK is ranked 45th while AndEngine is ranked 102nd. The most important reason people chose Loom SDK is:

Loom can live update changes in realtime, allowing you to see them on multiple devices immediately.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best 2D game engines?

Pros

Pro
Live reload of code and assets across multiple platforms

Loom can live update changes in realtime, allowing you to see them on multiple devices immediately.

Pro
Powerful command line workflow

Loom Turbo ($5/mo) gives access to powerful command line tools. For example, "loom new" to make a new project, "loom run" to run it. Packaging, deploy, and live reload are done automatically for you.

Pro
Open source

The Loom runtime and LoomScript compiler are open source, with code available on GitHub, allowing you to have the freedom to fix the bugs and add the features your game needs.

Pro
Examples

Loom includes over 30 examples ranging from complete sample games to demos of single features.

Pro
Familiar and powerful scripting

Loom's scripting language is immediately familiar if you know JavaScript, ActionScript, TypeScript, C#, or Java. Internally, it uses a proven VM technology with over 10 years of heavy use in games.

Pro
Good support

Loom devs are helpful.

Pro
Cross-platform

Loom can deploy to Windows, OS X, Linux, iOS, Android (including Nook, Kindle Fire and Ouya). There are also custom port available for WP8, Blackberry and consoles.

Pro
Functionality can be extended

AndEngine has extensions that can add additional functionality to the engine.

Ad
Cons

Con
Documentation is lacking

Con
No visual tools support

There's no level editor, asset viewer or any other visual tools in Loom SDK. Everything has to go through command line. I think it's fine if you really like typing.