When comparing GVim vs CudaText, the Slant community recommends CudaText for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source text editors for programming?” CudaText is ranked 13th while GVim is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose CudaText is:
About ~180 programming languages supported at the time of writing either built-in or can be added easily with the addon manager.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Vim without a shell
When opening files from the file manager, it is still nice to have vim.
Pro Excellent performance
Because it loads the whole file into RAM, replacing all string occurences in 100MB+ files is quick and easy. Every other editor sort of died during that.
Pro Works on all platforms
Whether its your windows machine, a Linux, Unix or a Mac Vim would work everywhere. You can even build it from its source on your favorite linux environment.
Pro Has different cursor shape in command and insert modes
Unlike vim, gvim has different cursor shape in command and insert mode, which is very convenient.
Pro Supports all vim features and settings
All vim features, custom settings, and plugins are automatically available.
Pro Many programming languages supported for syntax highlighting
About ~180 programming languages supported at the time of writing either built-in or can be added easily with the addon manager.
Pro Minimap plugin available
Pro Addons can be developed in Python
Pro Package for Linux ARM available
Pro Addon manager
Useful built-in addon manager.
Cons
Con GVim, like Vim, has a difficult learning curve
A lot of time is needed to learn all the commands and modes supported. A lot of time will also be spent tuning all the settings to the user's preference.