When comparing platform.sh vs Bitbucket Pipelines, the Slant community recommends platform.sh for most people. In the question“What are the best hosted continuous integration services?” platform.sh is ranked 21st while Bitbucket Pipelines is ranked 23rd. The most important reason people chose platform.sh is:
Bitbucket’s Connect architecture takes this a level beyond a simple “click to deploy” button. The ability of add-ons to add features into the user interface means you can configure your deployment environments without leaving Bitbucket.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Atlassian Connect for Bitbucket add-on
Bitbucket’s Connect architecture takes this a level beyond a simple “click to deploy” button. The ability of add-ons to add features into the user interface means you can configure your deployment environments without leaving Bitbucket.
Pro Provides time taken for each step
Eg:
./1.setup.sh 48s
./2.build.sh 56s
With this information, it's easy to find out which line of the script is the bottleneck of the build process.
Pro Great Jira integration
The same company Atlassian built Jira, which provides top-tier integration with Jira.
Pro Combined service: source control and CI
Cons
Con Only 50 mins/month free usage
The Free plan only gives you 50 minutes per month to run the build.