When comparing platform.sh vs Wercker, the Slant community recommends Wercker for most people. In the question“What are the best hosted continuous integration services?” Wercker is ranked 5th while platform.sh is ranked 21st. The most important reason people chose Wercker is:
Wercker is based on Docker and it allows developers to create their own deployment stacks inside Docker containers. These stacks range from programming languages, to services, and even to notifications.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Atlassian Connect for Bitbucket add-on
Bitbucket’s Connect architecture takes this a level beyond a simple “click to deploy” button. The ability of add-ons to add features into the user interface means you can configure your deployment environments without leaving Bitbucket.
Pro Ability to create and use custom environments
Wercker is based on Docker and it allows developers to create their own deployment stacks inside Docker containers. These stacks range from programming languages, to services, and even to notifications.
Pro Free unlimited number of private repositories CI while in Beta
While in beta, Wercker offers unlimited free public and private repositories.
Pro Social networking elements
Wercker has an activity feed with which different team members can see and follow everything their colleagues have been doing. This gives the tool a certain social network feel, much like GitHub itself.