When comparing Ionic Framework vs zeep, the Slant community recommends Ionic Framework for most people. In the question“What are the best frameworks for developing iOS apps with JavaScript?” Ionic Framework is ranked 3rd while zeep is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose Ionic Framework is:
Large quantity of plugins to access native APIs without code nothing in native language.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Cordova plugins
Large quantity of plugins to access native APIs without code nothing in native language.
Pro Large, friendly and active community
Ionic Framework is currently one of the most popular frameworks for hybrid mobile app development. This has resulted in a very large community of active users who contribute to the community by writing tutorials and answering questions.
Pro Free and open source
Ionic is free to use and open source, resulting in an active and helpful community of users and contributors.
Pro Compatible with multiple Python versions
Compatible with Python 2.7, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 and PyPy.
Pro Build on top of lxml and requests
Pro Supports automatic retry on error
Retries can be configured in Requests transport for a wide variety of errors.
Pro Caches WSDL files by default
Local cache is configurable and can be disabled (e.g. using all wsdl files from local disk).
Pro Handles correctly circular dependencies in WSDL files
Pro Supports WSDL files according to the standard
Identifies errors in WSDL files; uses without errors standard-compliant files.
Pro Support for WSA and WSSE
Pro Support for Asyncio
Support for asyncio via aiohttp (Python 3.5+).
Pro Support for Soap 1.1, Soap 1.2 and HTTP bindings
Cons
Con Can be buggy
Ionic is still a young framework (version 1.0 was released in May 2015). There are still some quirks and bugs in the framework to work out, which you can see a list of on their Github.
However Ionic is under active development and bugs are generally addressed quickly.
Con Buggy
In some cases, received XML is not correctly parsed into objects.
