Here’s the Deal

Pure CSS from Yahoo! vs Material Design Lite

30 21

51 31

When comparing Pure CSS from Yahoo! vs Material Design Lite, the Slant community recommends Material Design Lite for most people. In the question“What is the best CSS framework?” Material Design Lite is ranked 12th while Pure CSS from Yahoo! is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Material Design Lite is:

Material Design Lite is a framework created by Google, who are also responsible for the creation of Material Design.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What is the best CSS framework?

What are the best fully-featured responsive CSS frameworks?

Pros

Pro
Easy to customize

Has an extremely minimalist look that is super-easy to customize since it basically gives designers just a foundation on which they can easily build their design.

Pro
Cross-Browser compatibility

A solid base built on Normalize.css to fix cross-browser compatibility issues.

Pro
Lightweight

Extremely small file size: 4.5KB minified + gzip.

Pro
Responsive

A responsive grid that can be customized to your needs.

Pro
Works well with Bootstrap

Easily use Bootstrap CSS and JS elements within the framework.

Pro
Developed by Google

Material Design Lite is a framework created by Google, who are also responsible for the creation of Material Design.

Pro
Very customizable

Ad
Cons

Con
Not suitable for beginners

Since Pure CSS only carries a minimum number of styles out of the box, it might not be great for beginners who want a complete style that looks good out of the box without having to customize it.