Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Hapi vs FastAPI, the Slant community recommends FastAPI for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” FastAPI is ranked 4th while Hapi is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose FastAPI is:
It has a simple but powerful dependency injection system, it can be used to handle authentication, per-user rate limiting, authorization controls (e.g. with roles), etc.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Backed by a major corporation
Hapi was developed and is still being used by Walmart. Being backed by such a major company means that it will not lose support any time soon and most importantly it's being developed by professionals and that you will always get support for it.
Pro Consistency across applications
Hapi's philosophy is that configuration is more important than code. This is especially useful for very large teams because it helps developers maintain consistency and reusability throughout their code.
Pro Dependency injection
It has a simple but powerful dependency injection system, it can be used to handle authentication, per-user rate limiting, authorization controls (e.g. with roles), etc.
Pro Standards
It is based on standards: OpenAPI, JSON Schema and OAuth 2.0.
Pro Data validation
It validates the data using the types you declared. Even in deeply nested JSON requests.
Pro High-performance
It's based on Starlette and Pydantic, so, it's one of the fastest Python frameworks.
Pro Editor completion
It is based on Python type declarations, so, editors and tools can give great support. Including type checks and autocompletion everywhere.
Pro One of the fastest growing communities
Pro Fast is really fast (!)
It's easy to develop API based applications in Python on deadlines for Android and IOS Development.
Pro Automatic docs
It generates interactive API documentation automatically from your code.
Pro Database independent
It's independent of database or ORM, but compatible with all of them. Including relational databases and NoSQL.
Pro Async IO / optional
It's based on Async IO, which gives it high concurrency. But you can use non-async libraries and it runs them appropriately.
Pro World class documentation
It has some of the best documentation of any framework.
Pro WebSockets
Because it's an async framework, it can handle async-native protocols like WebSockets.
Pro OAuth 2.0
It has integrated support for OAuth 2.0. Including declaring required scopes per endpoint. So, you can easily integrate it with external OAuth 2.0 providers or build your own with it.
Pro Background tasks
Included support for background tasks, thanks to being based on Starlette.
Pro Supports GraphQL
Python's graphene library is included as an optional dependency meaning that GraphQL API's are supported out of the box, with no additional tweaking needed.
Cons
Con Requires too much boilerplate
Hapi seems to be made with large applications in mind. The sheer amount of boilerplate code it requires is simply not practical for a small web app. This also means that there are few examples of Hapi applications around for beginners to learn from.
Con Smaller community
Since FastAPI is relatively new, its community is smaller than Django Rest Framework. But it can grow with time.
