Here’s the Deal

Genome2D vs AndEngine

5 1

8 5

When comparing Genome2D vs AndEngine, the Slant community recommends Genome2D for most people. In the question“What are the best 2D game engines?” Genome2D is ranked 47th while AndEngine is ranked 102nd. The most important reason people chose Genome2D is:

It's the fastest gpu-based framework out there for flash. It's beautifully optimised. It has very low rendering latency, low level OpenGL calls that other tech simply cannot do (ie Unity) due to Stage3D, and thus can render a lot more data quicker

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best 2D game engines?

Pros

Pro
Lightning fast

Pro
Cross-platform mobile, desktop and web

Supports Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, iOS, Android, Web and native Flash.

And with the HTML5 export, it also potentially supports development for the Wii U :)

Pro
Haxe!

Haxe is a strictly typed programming language that saves development time but still compiles high performance executables, and can build for tons of different platforms (flash, c++, html5, java, c#, etc.)

Pro
Access to direct draw features

Has access to direct draw features so you can make you own rendering structures (scene graphs etc).

Pro
Automatic dynamic batching

Automatically batch geometries with dynamic batching techniques (by using constant buffers).

Pro
Component based architecture

Pro
Functionality can be extended

AndEngine has extensions that can add additional functionality to the engine.

Ad
Cons

Con
Lacks documentation

The API documentation is minimal, there's not many tutorials and the ones that are there are very small and only cover the basics. If you want to learn how to properly use it, you have to ask the community or read the source code and figure it out.