When comparing ROX Desktop vs WCM Commander, the Slant community recommends ROX Desktop for most people. In the question“What are the best file managers for UNIX-like systems?” ROX Desktop is ranked 24th while WCM Commander is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose ROX Desktop is:
Programs open noticeably faster with ROX Desktop than with most other Desktop Environments.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast
Programs open noticeably faster with ROX Desktop than with most other Desktop Environments.
Pro Official packages for major distributions
ROX can be built from source like many other solutions or can be installed from official packages available for all the major distributions (Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, openSUSE, Mandriva and Slackware).
Pro Singular load/save dialog
Instead of learning and navigating a multitude of file dialogs, simply drag and drop files between your app and your folders.
Pro Built-in terminal
Has a built-in terminal from which users can run any kind of command.
Pro Virtual file system
WCM Commander has a virtual file system for smb, ftp and sftp.
Pro Built-in editor
WCM Commander has a built-in text editor with syntax highlighting included.
Cons
Con Discontinued
discontinued since years, only the filemanager, the terminal and zeroinstall are still developed
Con Very ugly UI
Con Redundant default configuration
Because speed is one of the main points and objectives of ROX, the default configuration can be redundant for some and it's design also makes a lot of assumptions on how users prefer to work.
Con File editing on virtual file systems not supported
You cannot edit files in the virtual file system.