When comparing nano vs CudaText, the Slant community recommends CudaText for most people. In the question“What are the best programming text editors?” CudaText is ranked 10th while nano is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose CudaText is:
About ~180 programming languages supported at the time of writing either built-in or can be added easily with the addon manager.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy to use
Nano includes only the bare minimum of functionality needed to edit documents making it very simple.
Pro Built-in cheat sheet for shortcuts
Shortcuts for common commands are shown at the bottom of the editor.
Pro Available on almost every Linux system as default
Similar to vi (vim), you can find nano on most Unix-like systems (even on Cygwin).
Pro Most of the languages supported
Syntax coloring is available for most of the programming language.
Pro Lightweight and bug free
Very stable editor that never hangs / leaks or crashes.
Pro Many programming languages supported for syntax highlighting
About ~180 programming languages supported at the time of writing either built-in or can be added easily with the addon manager.
Pro Minimap plugin available
Pro Addons can be developed in Python
Pro Package for Linux ARM available
Pro Addon manager
Useful built-in addon manager.
Cons
Con Limited feature set
While nano is fine for writing blog posts or doing quick modifications, it's probably not suitable for programmers or someone who needs to work on an editor for an extensive period of time.
Con Uncommon keybindings
Nano uses a strange set of default keybindings, which is totally different than Vim, Emacs, VSCode and Sublime.