When comparing Portage vs Flatpak, the Slant community recommends Portage for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux package managers?” Portage is ranked 2nd while Flatpak is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose Portage is:
WIth portage you can decide and customize which dependencies to install through some thing called USE flags. These are keywords that when defined, will tell Portage that you want support for the chosen keyword.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Decide which dependencies to install
WIth portage you can decide and customize which dependencies to install through some thing called USE flags. These are keywords that when defined, will tell Portage that you want support for the chosen keyword.
Pro Sandboxes build process
Portage uses a sandbox as a safety measure during build processes. This is done to ensure that no packages accidentally write outside a 'safe' location.
Pro Can install multiple versions of the same package simultaneously
Slotting is a feature which allows users to install multiple versions of a software simultaneously. This is especially useful for libraries which have changed interfaces between versions.
Pro Allows both binary and source installation
With portage you can either compile packages from source or you can download and install their binary versions.
Pro Implements a standard with alternate implementations
If you need faster resolution, you can run pkgcore for search and portage for installing, and they work well together.
Pro Simple overlay management
Adding supplemental repositories, aka overlays, is easy with eselect-repository or layman.
Pro Respects customized config files
By default, portage doesn't delete or move any customized config files, thus enabling competent users to modify any config file however they want.
Pro You can view a list of programs that can be installed
With portage you can view a list of all the programs that you can install by going to /usr/portage
and running ls
.
Pro Full control over installed packages
You can fully control all packages if you use it properly.
Pro Cross-distribution
You can install flatpak packages on any distro you want.
Pro fast
searching, installing and updating are faster than others in my experience
Pro Doesn't bog system down like snaps.
Plus it's not proprietary.
Pro Application sandboxing
All applications are limited to a set of predefined permissions, enhancing privacy and security.
Pro A well-written documentation
Pro Flexible runtime management
You can install a lot of runtimes for different apps, making applications a lot more compatible while still allowing some applications to share their runtimes.
Cons
Con High memory usage
Usually takes between 400-800MB of RSS (no problem to get over 1GB), so it's nothing for an old hardware.
Con Building from source take a lot of processing time
Most of Portage's pros are related to its "porting" process, building packages from source. This is very resource-intensive, with the few biggest packages sometimes taking even multiple hours to update or install.
Con Very slow
Dependency resolution is very slow and single-threaded, so usually you will see one of your cores running like crazy for over a minute.
Con Feature creep
It is very complicated and offers plenty of options.
Con You can not create packages under a non-portage distribution
Makes maintaining software for gentoo based systems a burden.
Con Bloated
Due to the way Flatpack handles packaging, this can lead to a large cache being created which quickly inflates to unreasonable sizes. Not only this, but using flatpack requires a large chunk of space to be reserved for it's own file hierarchy.
Con Difficult to export packages
It is difficult and convoluted to export installed packages and move to another system.
Con Doesn't work well with CLI programs
Invoking CLI programs can be a pain. From the weird reverse DNS package names to difficulty in easily managing container environment.