When comparing Webpack vs Duo, the Slant community recommends Webpack for most people. In the question“What are the best open source front-end package managers?” Webpack is ranked 2nd while Duo is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose Webpack is:
Plugins and loaders are easy to write and allow you to control each step of the build, from loading and compiling CoffeeScript, LESS and JADE files to smart post processing and asset manifest building.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Rich and flexible plugin infrastructure
Plugins and loaders are easy to write and allow you to control each step of the build, from loading and compiling CoffeeScript, LESS and JADE files to smart post processing and asset manifest building.
Pro Tap into npm's huge module ecosystem
Using Webpack opens you up to npm, that has over 80k modules of which a great amount work both client-side and server-side. And the list is growing rapidly.
Pro Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks loaded on demand, to reduce initial loading time
Webpack allows you to split your codebase into multiple chunks. Chunks are loaded on demand. This reduces the initial loading time.
Pro Supports source maps for easier debugging
Source maps allow for easier debugging, because they allow you to find the problems within the origin files instead of the output file.
Pro ES6 module support
Webpack supports ES6 modules and their import
and export
methods without having to compile them to CommonJS require
Pro Share the same modules client-side and server-side
Because Webpack allows you to use the same require() function as node.js, you can easily share modules between the client-side and server-side.
Pro Bundles CommonJs and AMD modules (even combined)
Webpack supports AMD and CommonJS module styles. It performs clever static analysis on the AST of your code. It even has an evaluation engine to evaluate simple expressions. This allows you to support most existing libraries.
Pro Mix ES6 AMD and CommonJS
Webpack supports using all three module types, even in the same file.
Pro Limit plugin integration issues
Pro Handles the entire build and packaging process for you
Because Duo allows you to require dependencies directly in your html, css, and javascript, you don't need to manage annoying build processes. Duo automatically supports preprocessed languages like Coffeescript and Sass, and automatically bundles them into a single file, making it an easy-to-use, all-in-one tool. All you have to do is run duo in > out
and you're done!
Pro Allows you to directly require dependencies from Javascript, HTML, and CSS
With Duo you don't need to manage a separate dependency file, you just require projects from your files where you need them. It works with all front-end languages, giving you powerful inline Javascript, HTML, CSS, and even JSON management in a way that no other package manager supports.
Pro Require directly from github
Duo allows you to use require
to import packages directly from github using the username/package_name@version
syntax. The version is optional, in case you want to test out a new package quickly.
Pro Built on top of Component
Duo can be seen as an easier to use, more feature complete wrapper around component.
Pro Supports both Bower and Component packages
Duo is primarily designed to support Component packages, but Bower package support is available with npm support planned, so you can use Duo with libraries as well as components.
Cons
Con Config file may be hard to understand
Due to a somewhat hard to grasp syntax, configuring Webpack may take some time.
Con Can not load files discovered during runtime
Con Harder to manage versions between files
Because versions and dependencies can be specified inline, it might be harder to update your packages when you want to upgrade. (However, it is possible to specify dependencies in a JSON file.)
Con Cannot extract modules from a bundle and put into another one
As for common modules shared by multiple pages, duo.js cannot extract and put them into another bundle which is loaded commonly. On the other hand, modules modified rarely should put into another bundle so they can be still cached when other modules change.