When comparing Laverna vs Joplin, the Slant community recommends Joplin for most people. In the question“What is the best cross-platform note taking app?” Joplin is ranked 18th while Laverna is ranked 35th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Supports tasks
Application also supports tasks. Adding tasks as easy as in GitHub.
None of the developers can get access to personal data because they are using IndexedDB and localStorage. In fact all information will be stored only on client-side.
Pro No registration required
Pro Several editing modes
Laverna supports several editing modes: distraction-free mode, preview mode and normal.
In settings page it is possible to enable synchronizing with cloud storage. After that all information can be accessed from anywhere.
Simple and fast to learn and use.
Pro Encrypts all data on the client's side
Laverna can encrypt all notes on client side with SJCL library and no one, except the user, can get access to them.
Pro Good Markdown support
Laverna web app uses pagedown and ACE editor.
Pro Remote storage
Supports the remoteStorage protocol for personal privacy data storage.
Pro Open source
All code is open source and available on GitHub.
Pro Supports markdown
Pro Offline access
Supports Windows, Mac, Linux, Android and iOS.
Pro Supports tags for notes
Pro Supports multiple languages
English, French, and Spanish.
Pro Supports file attachments
Pro Web Clipper
Browser extension saves full pages, clean content, or screen selections to new notes.
Pro Open source
Peace of mind that there is no malicious piece of software in the app.
Pro Nextcloud support
Pro Active user forum with support from app creators
Support, troubleshooting, and new feature requests are easy to make at the user forum and you can contact the app creator directly.
Pro Optional CLI interface
Provides a CLI interface for terminal lovers.
Pro Timed alarm reminder for to-do lists
Con No drag'n'drop image upload
Con Still a lot of bugs to squash
Laverna is still in early stages of development and as such not all functionality is well tested.
Con Sync issue under Linux
The Linux client has a bug that requires the user to click the mouse frequently in order for sync to proceed. This bug has been open for a while.