When comparing ForkLift 3 vs krusader, the Slant community recommends krusader for most people. In the question“What are the best Total Commander alternatives for Linux and OSX?” krusader is ranked 5th while ForkLift 3 is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose krusader is:
Has everything you might wish for and more.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Best UX/UI'd file manager on the market
It's just a perfectly crafted app, try and enjoy
Pro Rewritten in Swift
Forklift 3 is a significant update from FL2, having been rewritten entirely in Swift.
Pro Optional dark UI
In addition to the default Mac gray UI, Forklift 3 offers an alternate "Dark Mode" featuring light text elements against dark backgrounds.
Pro Connect to and mount lots of storage options
FTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Google Drive, Rackspace CloudFiles, SMB, AFP, NFS, VNC, etc.
Pro Easily toggle hidden files
Pro Built-in application remover
Pro Versatile
Has everything you might wish for and more.
Pro Root mode
Dangerous but sometimes useful.
Pro Multiple tabs
Tabs with other listings, and options to move the tab to the other side.
Pro Advanced renamer
Via package krename.
Pro Directory compare
Compare 2 directories on content or file/date and sync them.
Pro Archive support
Browse archives as folders.
Cons
Con Like Apple, it does not standardize file size. Mixes up KBs, MBs GBs in the same column which makes it very difficult to review file sizes
Con Like Apple, shows the date of Today's file as "Today" instead of the actual date
Con Does not sync the "selected" folders (i.e. highlighted ones), but the "current" folders (i.e. the top of the visible tree.)
Con Does not show the fixed tree section in the left pane of a dual horizontal panes
