When comparing IndieGoGo vs Early Access, the Slant community recommends IndieGoGo for most people. In the question“What are the best ways to fund development of an independent game?” IndieGoGo is ranked 3rd while Early Access is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose IndieGoGo is:
While all or nothing is an option, flexible funding gives people the option to receive money even if the goal isn't met.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Allows both all-or-nothing and flexible-funding plans
While all or nothing is an option, flexible funding gives people the option to receive money even if the goal isn't met.
Pro Get end-user feedback earlier in development
Because early access doubles as a public playtest, you can get valuable user feedback while there's still time to implement changes.
Cons
Con Poor gaming community can dull pledgers' enthusiasm
Without the game-funding reputation of Kickstarter or the novelty of smaller sites, IndieGoGo campaigns can receive dubious reactions from the public.
Con Not viable until the game is in a playable state
Early access depends on consumer interest, and few consumers will be interested in an unplayable pre-alpha build. Another option must be used for early development.