When comparing Gnu On Windows vs Windows Subsystem for Linux, the Slant community recommends Windows Subsystem for Linux for most people. In the question“What are the best collections of Unix libraries for Windows?” Windows Subsystem for Linux is ranked 2nd while Gnu On Windows is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose Windows Subsystem for Linux is:
Windows Subsystem for Linux comes with common UNIX utilities such as `grep`, `awk`, etc.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Stable binaries
All commands are kept up to date but also as stable as possible.
Around 10 MB (alternatives can be 10 times this size).
Pro Shell window from any directory
Adds a Windows Explorer shell window so that you can right-click on any directory and open a command (cmd.exe) window from that directory.
Manage the path, can add a "Command Prompt Here" shortcut. Good for beginners needing these tools.
Pro Includes common UNIX utilities
Windows Subsystem for Linux comes with common UNIX utilities such as
Pro Light resource usage unlike virtual machines
There's no VM overhead because WSL is not a VM.
Pro Supports multiple Linux distributions
WSL supports multiple Linux distros, and you can use the distro's package manager (e.g.
apt-get on Ubuntu) to install other tools and binaries.
Pro Runs native Linux tools
Con You can't mix and match installations - utilities added to the subsystem are only available in the subsystem
If you install node in the windows subsystem it is not available in windows only in the subsystem and vice versa.