When comparing Clash of Clans vs VEGA Conflict, the Slant community recommends VEGA Conflict for most people. In the question“What are the best Android games with persistent things to upgrade that can be played for a few minutes at a time?” VEGA Conflict is ranked 1st while Clash of Clans is ranked 2nd. The most important reason people chose VEGA Conflict is:
Whether on wants to focus on defense or offense when building their bases either can work in the grand scheme of the game. By going with one over the other it does not limit or hobble that player meaning one is free to go with what kind of gameplay suits them best.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fun slow paced incremental gameplay
For those looking for a casual game to play at a slow pace in small chunk Clash of Clans has gameplay that fits that scenario quite well. Players slowly build up their base into a fortress by creating building to contain within as well as walls to surround it. This all happens over time and can not be immediately done so is a game focused on being played throughout a day in small pieces over many months to years. Slowly but surely the time invested will lead to creating a large base that can take on other large opponents.
Pro Formulated to be very addictive
The whole design of the game was created around having the player come back to the game. Only through making a better and better base and units can one succeed and only through coming back to the game over and over again to upgrade these areas can one do that. It is the promise of success if you just do one more thing, and another, and another that creates the sense that at some point can the player really be "winning", which to many is a very fun feeling.
Pro Differing user strategies can work equally well
Whether on wants to focus on defense or offense when building their bases either can work in the grand scheme of the game. By going with one over the other it does not limit or hobble that player meaning one is free to go with what kind of gameplay suits them best.
Pro Fun social gameplay where players build alliances
Throughout the game players are able to build up relationships with other players through alliances. The alliances can be used for help during the games such as asking for aid. There is also no limit to how much one can help other players, and in doing so makes for a game where much of it is social where joining an alliance can exponentially reward the player.
Cons
Con Too focused on in-app purchases
The game is heavily designed to get you to start paying for things by creating slow moving gameplay with wait timers and overpriced items. Only when players pay real money can the realistically move the gameplay along at an acceptable pace of that found in most paid upfront games.
Con Requires a network connection
Con Not really free
It's free to play, but a much heard criticism on Steam is that because of recent changes you will have to pay quite a lot to be able to enjoy the game.
Con Cross platform play leads to unbalanced PvP
Mobile (Android, iOS) players are all playing together with desktop PC players, which means during dog fighting sequences the PC players have much finer grained controls over their mobile player opponents. This makes for unfair matching that can lead to mobile players loosing out more often than not if they are facing a PC player. This is also exacerbated by the fact that no one is able to know what platform an opponent may be playing on. So for those on PC their may be the chance of overly easy battles in the game, which may get tiring or lose its appeal.