When comparing VideoGamerTV vs Super Bunnyhop, the Slant community recommends Super Bunnyhop for most people. In the question“Who are the best game critics? ” Super Bunnyhop is ranked 4th while VideoGamerTV is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Super Bunnyhop is:
Super Bunnyhop tends to be miles above other reviewers and critics in his analysis of a game by breaking down all of the components in a manner that is easily accessible as well as highly researched.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro A real website for real people, about real games, with real journalists
A lighthearted and comical approach to video game coverage with a focus on entertainment above all else.
Pro Offer companion websote with text reviews
For those that like to read their reviews over watching them there is a companion website for VideoGamerTV called VideoGamer.com. They offer not only text reviews but also gaming news as well as a forum for interaction and discussion.
Pro Breaks down games in an easy to understand and highly detailed way
Super Bunnyhop tends to be miles above other reviewers and critics in his analysis of a game by breaking down all of the components in a manner that is easily accessible as well as highly researched.
Pro Displays professionalism in the reviews/critiques
The host has a journalism degree and follows the rules, ethics and qualities expected of a professional Journalist.
When a subject is being explored, viewers are first given some prior knowledge required to understand the subject at hand. Sources and other information is also made readily available for anyone to use.
Cons
Con Unable to fully fund themselves
Their site, podcasts and Youtube channel are not earning enough to sustain themselves and have started a Patreon account in order to find more funding for their buisness. This is not reassuring that they are spending more money than they are taking in which could mean trouble in the future if Patreon does not fully support their costs.
Con Videos can be long winded
While the information often provided is very detailed it can be long winded which means it takes time to watch, which is an investment from the viewer that is not always able to be given.