When comparing VideoGamerTV vs Jim Sterling, the Slant community recommends Jim Sterling for most people. In the question“Who are the best game critics? ” Jim Sterling is ranked 9th while VideoGamerTV is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Jim Sterling is:
Jim Sterling is known for stepping on toes once in a while. In 2009 he gave Assassin's Creed II a 4 our of 10 when most reviewers praised the game, he heavily criticised Peter Molyneyx, a respected industry figure, for constantly overselling and under-delivering his games and manipulating the consumers, etc.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro A real website for real people, about real games, with real journalists
A lighthearted and comical approach to video game coverage with a focus on entertainment above all else.
Pro Offer companion websote with text reviews
For those that like to read their reviews over watching them there is a companion website for VideoGamerTV called VideoGamer.com. They offer not only text reviews but also gaming news as well as a forum for interaction and discussion.
Pro Not afraid to speak his mind
Jim Sterling is known for stepping on toes once in a while. In 2009 he gave Assassin's Creed II a 4 our of 10 when most reviewers praised the game, he heavily criticised Peter Molyneyx, a respected industry figure, for constantly overselling and under-delivering his games and manipulating the consumers, etc.
Pro Pro-consumer attitude
Jim Sterling has criticised Valve's Steam Greenlight for having a lack of quality control, multiple developers of "asset flipping" (presenting ready-made game engine assets as a game), the mainstream media for portraying games as causing violence, etc.
Pro Thank God for Him
Cons
Con Unable to fully fund themselves
Their site, podcasts and Youtube channel are not earning enough to sustain themselves and have started a Patreon account in order to find more funding for their buisness. This is not reassuring that they are spending more money than they are taking in which could mean trouble in the future if Patreon does not fully support their costs.
Con Can be seen as overly hostile
As Sterling has a tendency to cover (often touchy) topics in a somewhat inflammatory, unapologetic manner, he often gets perceived as being needlessly hostile.
Con Is little more than a populist rabble rouser
Whatever gamers are upset about this week, expect the Jimquisition to be following along promptly with a preachy, whiny summation of things everyone said already.