When comparing Super Bunnyhop vs Jim Sterling, the Slant community recommends Super Bunnyhop for most people. In the question“Who are the best game critics? ” Super Bunnyhop is ranked 4th while Jim Sterling is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Super Bunnyhop is:
Super Bunnyhop tends to be miles above other reviewers and critics in his analysis of a game by breaking down all of the components in a manner that is easily accessible as well as highly researched.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Breaks down games in an easy to understand and highly detailed way
Super Bunnyhop tends to be miles above other reviewers and critics in his analysis of a game by breaking down all of the components in a manner that is easily accessible as well as highly researched.
Pro Displays professionalism in the reviews/critiques
The host has a journalism degree and follows the rules, ethics and qualities expected of a professional Journalist.
When a subject is being explored, viewers are first given some prior knowledge required to understand the subject at hand. Sources and other information is also made readily available for anyone to use.
Pro Not afraid to speak his mind
Jim Sterling is known for stepping on toes once in a while. In 2009 he gave Assassin's Creed II a 4 our of 10 when most reviewers praised the game, he heavily criticised Peter Molyneyx, a respected industry figure, for constantly overselling and under-delivering his games and manipulating the consumers, etc.
Pro Pro-consumer attitude
Jim Sterling has criticised Valve's Steam Greenlight for having a lack of quality control, multiple developers of "asset flipping" (presenting ready-made game engine assets as a game), the mainstream media for portraying games as causing violence, etc.
Pro Thank God for Him
Cons
Con Videos can be long winded
While the information often provided is very detailed it can be long winded which means it takes time to watch, which is an investment from the viewer that is not always able to be given.
Con Can be seen as overly hostile
As Sterling has a tendency to cover (often touchy) topics in a somewhat inflammatory, unapologetic manner, he often gets perceived as being needlessly hostile.
Con Is little more than a populist rabble rouser
Whatever gamers are upset about this week, expect the Jimquisition to be following along promptly with a preachy, whiny summation of things everyone said already.