When comparing OldManMurray vs Super Bunnyhop, the Slant community recommends Super Bunnyhop for most people. In the question“Who are the best game critics? ” Super Bunnyhop is ranked 4th while OldManMurray is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose Super Bunnyhop is:
Super Bunnyhop tends to be miles above other reviewers and critics in his analysis of a game by breaking down all of the components in a manner that is easily accessible as well as highly researched.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro The originators of Wolpaw's law
There are games so bad, that while playing them comes a point where the experience and the opinion on said game is unsalvageable. At that point one can, in good faith, review the game without finishing it. And then there are games that blow up monitors.
Pro True objective reviews by the way of "Crate Review System"
Inventors of the only truly objective review system - Crate Review System. The point you encounter a Crate in the game signifies when the developers have run out of new ideas, the longer it takes to encounter a Crate the better the game (e.g. it takes longer to encounter a Crate in Blood than it takes in Half-Life, therefore Blood is the better game game).
Pro Breaks down games in an easy to understand and highly detailed way
Super Bunnyhop tends to be miles above other reviewers and critics in his analysis of a game by breaking down all of the components in a manner that is easily accessible as well as highly researched.
Pro Displays professionalism in the reviews/critiques
The host has a journalism degree and follows the rules, ethics and qualities expected of a professional Journalist.
When a subject is being explored, viewers are first given some prior knowledge required to understand the subject at hand. Sources and other information is also made readily available for anyone to use.
Cons
Con No longer updated
Sadly the site is no longer used and is only up for archival purposes.
Con Videos can be long winded
While the information often provided is very detailed it can be long winded which means it takes time to watch, which is an investment from the viewer that is not always able to be given.