GCC vs Clang/LLVM
When comparing GCC vs Clang/LLVM, the Slant community recommends GCC for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source C/C++ compilers?” GCC is ranked 1st while Clang/LLVM is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose GCC is:
GCC was first released in 1987 when it was called the GNU C Compiler, a couple of months after it was released it was extended to support C++ too. Nowadays it supports other languages than C or C++. Having been in use and constant development for more than 20 years it has reached a state of maturity and stability. The fact that it's so old also means that there are countless resources out there for people who want to use it.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Mature
GCC was first released in 1987 when it was called the GNU C Compiler, a couple of months after it was released it was extended to support C++ too. Nowadays it supports other languages than C or C++.
Having been in use and constant development for more than 20 years it has reached a state of maturity and stability. The fact that it's so old also means that there are countless resources out there for people who want to use it.
Pro Default on many systems
GCC is the default compiler on several systems. Most of the time people have it installed on their machine without even knowing it's there.
Pro Available for even the most obscure hardware
Since it's so old and very popular it has been ported to almost any architecture imaginable. This means that it's probably compatible with even the most obscure and unheard hardware.
Pro Very stable, excellent cross-platform use
Pro Fresh take on open source toolchain
With GCC accumulating a lot of craft and development is being sluggish LLVM has a lot of steam and community support behind it.
Pro Default on Some Systems
Now it's default compiler for FreeBSD and MacOS.