When comparing Nagios vs Dynatrace Ruxit, the Slant community recommends Nagios for most people. In the question“What are the best server performance monitoring tools?” Nagios is ranked 6th while Dynatrace Ruxit is ranked 20th. The most important reason people chose Nagios is:
Being one of the oldest tools of its kind in the market, Nagios is extremely popular. This is usually a good thing because there are a lot of resources on the internet about it such as guides and configuration recipes.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Popular
Being one of the oldest tools of its kind in the market, Nagios is extremely popular. This is usually a good thing because there are a lot of resources on the internet about it such as guides and configuration recipes.
Pro Scalable
Nagios was designed with flexibility and scalability in mind.
Pro Many open source options available
Pro Easy to use
Ruxit was easy to implement and work with. It automatically detects a running server without needing any scripts or config files set up.
Pro Dashboard provides a comprehensive overview
Ruxit's dashboard has a tile-based, customizable UI that's similar to that of Windows 8. It present information on CPU, memory and network.
Pro First 1,000 hours are free
Ruxit offers users the first 1,000 hours of monitoring for free.
Pro Affordable
Application monitoring is $0.15/hr.
Pro Offers problem root-cause analysis, evolution, replay
Shows you how problems evolved, what is affected, and how to fix them.
Cons
Con Lacks full nginx support
Nginx server support is in beta. It already shows response times, resource times, failure rates, top web requests etc. According to their site, full nginx support is coming soon.