Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariDropwizard vs Actix
When comparing Dropwizard vs Actix, the Slant community recommends Actix for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Actix is ranked 22nd while Dropwizard is ranked 28th.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Enhanced productivity and less timewasting
The application can be run and debugged from the IDE without the need to recompile or redeploy the WAR file. This is because a Dropwizard web application creates on main program which starts the jetty container.
Pro Application metrics integrated into the framework
Dropwizard comes with application metrics integrated out of the box. These metrics provide a lot of useful information such as request/response time.
For example, to get the execution time of a method, the @Timed annotation is used.
Pro Quick project bootstrap
Starting a project with Dropwizard si very easy and bootstraping is quick and painless. All that's needed is a single dependency added in the pom.xml file and it's ready to go.
Pro Blazingly fast
Pro Feature-rich
Actix provides a lot of features out of box. WebSockets, HTTP/2, pipelining etc
Pro Type-safe
Forget about stringly typed objects, from request to response, everything has types
Pro Extensible
Easily create your own libraries that any Actix application can use
Cons
Con Does not allow a lot a freedom of choice
Dropwizard removes a lot of freedom that the developer may have with other frameworks because of the fact that it tries to do everything itself. It chooses the best Java libraries for the job required, without allowing the developer much choice.
