When comparing My Singing Monsters vs VEGA Conflict, the Slant community recommends VEGA Conflict for most people. In the question“What are the best Android games with persistent things to upgrade that can be played for a few minutes at a time?” VEGA Conflict is ranked 1st while My Singing Monsters is ranked 3rd. The most important reason people chose VEGA Conflict is:
Whether on wants to focus on defense or offense when building their bases either can work in the grand scheme of the game. By going with one over the other it does not limit or hobble that player meaning one is free to go with what kind of gameplay suits them best.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Enjoyable music that does not get old
The songs within are catchy and fun and do not tire the listener, which is good for extended play sessions.
Pro Fun interactive music component
The player collects monsters that can be placed on islands, where in different islands can be purchased and used to store monsters. The monsters on those islands sing, which effects the tone of the background song. Each monster can be muted individually, which then can change the tone of the song depending on which monsters are muted. While not a main gameplay mechanic or anything the way a player can effect each islands music is an entertaining and fun component.
Pro Cute and entertaining monsters
The main goal of the game is to collect all of the different available monsters, of which there are tons, with each having a cute but ugly look to them with each having their own tune to add to the music of an island.
Pro Upgrades go on forever
The game is consistently upgraded, so even for people that rush through the game and collect all the available monsters (which is pretty time consuming to do) the devs add in more content in a consistent manner that adds even more monsters and islands to collect. Basically it is an ever expanding game.
Pro Differing user strategies can work equally well
Whether on wants to focus on defense or offense when building their bases either can work in the grand scheme of the game. By going with one over the other it does not limit or hobble that player meaning one is free to go with what kind of gameplay suits them best.
Pro Fun social gameplay where players build alliances
Throughout the game players are able to build up relationships with other players through alliances. The alliances can be used for help during the games such as asking for aid. There is also no limit to how much one can help other players, and in doing so makes for a game where much of it is social where joining an alliance can exponentially reward the player.
Cons
Con Prone to crashing after using the in-game store
For those that do use the in-game store there is a problem where the game crashes after long sessions in the store, which can be frustrating.
Con Not really free
It's free to play, but a much heard criticism on Steam is that because of recent changes you will have to pay quite a lot to be able to enjoy the game.
Con Cross platform play leads to unbalanced PvP
Mobile (Android, iOS) players are all playing together with desktop PC players, which means during dog fighting sequences the PC players have much finer grained controls over their mobile player opponents. This makes for unfair matching that can lead to mobile players loosing out more often than not if they are facing a PC player. This is also exacerbated by the fact that no one is able to know what platform an opponent may be playing on. So for those on PC their may be the chance of overly easy battles in the game, which may get tiring or lose its appeal.