Here’s the Deal

Strapi vs N2O

201 43

9 2

When comparing Strapi vs N2O, the Slant community recommends N2O for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” N2O is ranked 29th while Strapi is ranked 32nd.

Specs

DatabaseMongo, MySQL, Postgres, MariaDB, SQLite

LicenseMIT

Multi Language SupportYes

PlatformsWindows, Linux, Mac, Docker

TechnologyNode.js

Template EngineAll

Default ORMKVS

Default Template EngineNITRO

EncodingsJSON, BERT/ETF, XML

HostsCOWBOY, EMQ

Initial Release0.4

PriceFREE

ProtocolsHEART, FTP, NITRO

SecurityHMAC AES/CBC-128

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best backend web frameworks?

Pros

Pro
Auto-generate REST APIs

Strapi comes with blueprints that let you create, read, update and delete your data. You also can paginate, sort and filter your results in a matter of seconds with simple but yet specific parameters.

Pro
Users, groups and permissions

Manage user settings, login, registration, groups and permissions on the fly. Strapi delivers all those essential features out-of-the-box.

Pro
Out-of-the-box administration panel

Easy way to manage your application. This panel allows you to add/edit/delete entries for your APIs, manage your users, groups and permissions. In the future, it will be such as WordPress-like administration panel dedicated to your application.

Pro
Fast binary data

Pro
Binary encoding and protocols

Here is a list of types of endpoints which are supported by EMQ and accesible to N2O apps: WebSockets, MQTT, MQTT-SN, TCP, UDP, CoAP. Normal use of N2O as a Web Framework or a Web Application Server is through WebSockets, but for IoT and MQTT applications it could be served through UDP or SCTP protocols providing application level message delivery consistency.