When comparing Resumable.js vs jQuery File Upload, the Slant community recommends Resumable.js for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript libraries for file uploading?” Resumable.js is ranked 2nd while jQuery File Upload is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Resumable.js is:
Resumable.js splits each file into smaller chunks, this way if the upload of a chunk fails, uploading is retried until the procedure completes. This allows uploads to continue even after a network failure either locally or to the server. It also allows users to pause, resume and even recover uploads without even losing state.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fault tolerance for large files
Resumable.js splits each file into smaller chunks, this way if the upload of a chunk fails, uploading is retried until the procedure completes. This allows uploads to continue even after a network failure either locally or to the server. It also allows users to pause, resume and even recover uploads without even losing state.
Pro Good backend support
The backend can be found in many languages and for many frameworks.
Pro Free and open source
Resumable is completely free and distributed under the MIT license.
Pro Chunked uploads supported
jQuery file upload splits large files into smaller chunks in order to increase upload speed and be able to resume quickly if one of the chunks fails to upload. This is because it only needs to re-upload the smaller chunk that failed.
Pro Works with any server-side platform
Is compatible with all server-side technologies (Rails, PHP, ASP.NET etc...).
Cons
Con Limited browser support
Resumable.js only supports Firefox 4+ and Chrome 11+.
Con Wont let you add files programmatically
You can add files by binding to a file input or a dropzone, but you cannot add files programmatically.
Con Requires dependencies
jQuery File Upload requires the jQuery UI library and the jQuery iFrame Transport dependencies
Alternative Products
